From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp-server3.tampabay.rr.com ([65.32.1.41]) by speech.braille.uwo.ca with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 17Eawq-0005hg-00 for ; Sun, 02 Jun 2002 15:23:28 -0400 Received: from deedra (rrcs-se-24-129-160-25.biz.rr.com [24.129.160.25]) by smtp-server3.tampabay.rr.com (8.12.2/8.12.2) with SMTP id g52JNTQI027106 for ; Sun, 2 Jun 2002 15:23:30 -0400 (EDT) Date: Sun, 2 Jun 2002 15:23:29 -0400 (EDT) From: Deedra Waters X-Sender: dmwaters@deedra To: speakup@braille.uwo.ca Subject: Re: dynamic dns services In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: speakup-admin@braille.uwo.ca Errors-To: speakup-admin@braille.uwo.ca X-BeenThere: speakup@braille.uwo.ca X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.9 Precedence: bulk Reply-To: speakup@braille.uwo.ca List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Speakup is a screen review system for Linux. List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: i also use the same thing dan does, and have no problem at all. while my ip isn't static, my dns client updates my ip with the server so that I never have any downtime. On Sun, 2 Jun 2002, Dan Murphy wrote: > On Sun, 2 Jun 2002, Ed Barnes wrote: > > > Hi list. > > As some of you may know last week-end I downed my Linux system for most of > > Saturday. > > > I am wondering what the experiences of others have been who have used > > these services and I am wondering if there is a consensus among list > > members if one service is better than another for example. > Hi Ed and all. My experience is limited to selfhost.com and my current > service which is dyndns.org. > I have had 2 static ip addresses with dyndns now for over a month, and > have had no downtime what so ever. As these things go, I am new to > them, but if dyndns is any example, I'm quite happy. > > > > _______________________________________________ > Speakup mailing list > Speakup@braille.uwo.ca > http://speech.braille.uwo.ca/mailman/listinfo/speakup >