From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from ip15.shellworld.net ([64.49.204.174] helo=server2.shellworld.net ident=root) by speech.braille.uwo.ca with esmtp (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 1Hhw0c-00057C-00 for ; Sat, 28 Apr 2007 19:07:18 -0400 Received: from server2.shellworld.net (klewellen@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by server2.shellworld.net (8.13.1/8.12.8) with ESMTP id l3SN7HMl020668 for ; Sat, 28 Apr 2007 23:07:17 GMT (envelope-from klewellen@shellworld.net) Received: from localhost (klewellen@localhost) by server2.shellworld.net (8.13.1/8.12.8/Submit) with ESMTP id l3SN7Hrh020665 for ; Sat, 28 Apr 2007 19:07:17 -0400 (EDT) X-Authentication-Warning: server2.shellworld.net: klewellen owned process doing -bs Date: Sat, 28 Apr 2007 19:07:17 -0400 (EDT) From: Karen Lewellen To: "Speakup is a screen review system for Linux." Subject: ot perhaps, spell checkers for pine? In-Reply-To: <20070428202744.GB3859@implementation> Message-ID: References: <20070428110504.GA3947@implementation> <20070428180854.GA13119@localhost.localdomain> <20070428202744.GB3859@implementation> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-BeenThere: speakup@braille.uwo.ca X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list Reply-To: "Speakup is a screen review system for Linux." List-Id: "Speakup is a screen review system for Linux." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 28 Apr 2007 23:07:18 -0000 Greetings, I am a shellworld baby, as I have often shared. While Ken is marvelous as to keeping us up to date the best way he can, I do have a question...actually two. We have a spell checker incorporated into our pine setup. It is apparently not full proof though as I discover missed obvious misspellings later, and others have noted this too. I have no idea what we are using, I can find out of course, but does anyone know of a great option for pine, perhaps that even has a thesaurus? Second, once in a while others make mention of other browsers aside from Lynx the cat and the two variations in name of the chain, links and e-links. for reasons that I respect even if I do not understand them, e-links cannot be made to work on shellworld just now. I realize others dislike it, but I found it helpful when links itself was not working well with javascript locations. Any other browser ideas we might want to refer to Ken for consideration? Thanks all around, Karen