From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from suntzu.tacticuscommunications.net ([206.135.58.240]) by speech.braille.uwo.ca with esmtp (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 1GfQUS-00066P-00 for ; Wed, 01 Nov 2006 19:31:28 -0500 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by suntzu.tacticuscommunications.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id C8DBF1F52E for ; Wed, 1 Nov 2006 19:31:27 -0500 (EST) Received: from suntzu.tacticuscommunications.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (suntzu.tacticuscommunications.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 11858-07 for ; Wed, 1 Nov 2006 19:31:27 -0500 (EST) Received: by suntzu.tacticuscommunications.net (Postfix, from userid 1016) id E00A01F537; Wed, 1 Nov 2006 19:31:26 -0500 (EST) Received: from server2.shellworld.net (shellworld.net [209.61.182.169]) by suntzu.tacticuscommunications.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 55BD71F52E for ; Wed, 1 Nov 2006 19:31:26 -0500 (EST) Date: Wed, 1 Nov 2006 18:31:25 -0600 (CST) From: luke To: "Speakup is a screen review system for Linux." Subject: Re: modprobe speakupmain hangs In-Reply-To: <1162426466.3304.7.camel@chopin> Message-ID: References: <1162392434.3281.50.camel@chopin> <1162426466.3304.7.camel@chopin> Organization: Tacticus Communications, Inc. MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new-20030616-p10 (Debian) at tacticuscommunications.net X-BeenThere: speakup@braille.uwo.ca X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list Reply-To: "Speakup is a screen review system for Linux." List-Id: "Speakup is a screen review system for Linux." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 02 Nov 2006 00:31:28 -0000 On Thu, 2 Nov 2006, Hynek Hanke wrote: > However, I think the method you described is not guaranteed to work, > because in the time of the crash, modprobe is running a child process > and you would risk that this child process ends up being a zombie and > block the thing. I didn't test the exact behavior, but I wouldn't rely > on it. I agree that in other cases what you propose would be a much > cleaner solution. Well, I did say that it wasn't tested with modprobe.:) Luke