From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from ip15.shellworld.net
	([64.49.204.174] helo=server2.shellworld.net ident=root)
	by speech.braille.uwo.ca with esmtp (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian))
	id 1Dj1Qk-00084j-00
	for <speakup@braille.uwo.ca>; Thu, 16 Jun 2005 16:57:42 -0400
Received: from server2.shellworld.net (ldavis@localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by server2.shellworld.net (8.12.10/8.12.8) with ESMTP id j5GKvgVi090617
	for <speakup@braille.uwo.ca>; Thu, 16 Jun 2005 20:57:42 GMT
	(envelope-from ldavis@shellworld.net)
Received: from localhost (ldavis@localhost)
	by server2.shellworld.net (8.12.10/8.12.8/Submit) with ESMTP id
	j5GKvgtB090614
	for <speakup@braille.uwo.ca>; Thu, 16 Jun 2005 15:57:42 -0500 (CDT)
X-Authentication-Warning: server2.shellworld.net: ldavis owned process doing
	-bs
Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2005 15:57:42 -0500 (CDT)
From: Luke Davis <ldavis@shellworld.net>
To: "Speakup is a screen review system for Linux." <speakup@braille.uwo.ca>
In-Reply-To: <20050616133511.GB24002@blackbox>
Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.63.0506161551250.35011@freire2.furyyjbeyq.arg>
References: <Pine.BSF.4.63.0506160004000.35011@freire2.furyyjbeyq.arg>
	<20050616133511.GB24002@blackbox>
Organization: "Tacticus Communications, Inc."
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Subject: Re: Lost Insert After Upgrade
X-BeenThere: speakup@braille.uwo.ca
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
Reply-To: "Speakup is a screen review system for Linux."
	<speakup@braille.uwo.ca>
List-Id: "Speakup is a screen review system for Linux."
	<speakup.braille.uwo.ca>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://speech.braille.uwo.ca/mailman/listinfo/speakup>,
	<mailto:speakup-request@braille.uwo.ca?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://braille.uwo.ca/pipermail/speakup>
List-Post: <mailto:speakup@braille.uwo.ca>
List-Help: <mailto:speakup-request@braille.uwo.ca?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://speech.braille.uwo.ca/mailman/listinfo/speakup>,
	<mailto:speakup-request@braille.uwo.ca?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2005 20:57:43 -0000

On Thu, 16 Jun 2005, Kenny Hitt wrote:

> First: Sarge is now stable  It went stable last week.  If you did a
> dist-upgrade after an apt-get update, you should have been upgraded to
> Sarge.
[.]
> The fact you saw 250 packages upgraded says you were upgraded to Sarge.

Yes, this is what I had assumed, even though my apt sources were still 
pointing to "woody stable" for both debian org, and "woody" on backports.

I recognized that this is what happened, but only after the fact.  It was 
about 250 MB worth of packages, not 250 packages; my mis-typage in the 
previous message.

Thanks

Luke