From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from ip15.shellworld.net ([64.49.204.174] helo=server2.shellworld.net ident=root) by speech.braille.uwo.ca with esmtp (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 1CCmbS-0005GB-00 for ; Wed, 29 Sep 2004 18:07:14 -0400 Received: from server2.shellworld.net (klewellen@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by server2.shellworld.net (8.12.10/8.12.8) with ESMTP id i8TM7D9P071480 for ; Wed, 29 Sep 2004 22:07:13 GMT (envelope-from klewellen@shellworld.net) Received: from localhost (klewellen@localhost) by server2.shellworld.net (8.12.10/8.12.8/Submit) with ESMTP id i8TM7DAQ071477 for ; Wed, 29 Sep 2004 18:07:13 -0400 (EDT) X-Authentication-Warning: server2.shellworld.net: klewellen owned process doing -bs Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2004 18:07:13 -0400 (EDT) From: Karen Lewellen To: "Speakup is a screen review system for Linux." In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: <20040928003402.GD25684@romuald.net.eu.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Subject: Re: Linux and data storage? X-BeenThere: speakup@braille.uwo.ca X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: "Speakup is a screen review system for Linux." List-Id: "Speakup is a screen review system for Linux." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2004 22:07:14 -0000 Hi, Now that i have a minute. I appreciate your wisdom but the matter was never open for discussion as I said countless times. That you wanted to try to reason on a closed issue was fine, but fruitless. thanks though, Karen On Wed, 29 Sep 2004, Luke Davis wrote: > On Wed, 29 Sep 2004, Karen Lewellen wrote: > >> It was not until ken almost lost everything i have up here that i >> realized > > He didn't, but you're probably not reading this, so I won't waste my time > explaining that, or anything else. > >> I am not discussing this any further. No zip of this data. Why are you >> insisting upon trying to force this issue? > > I've explained that (but maybe it was something you skipped). > >> btw, I did not read all of your post. I am very busy at work and only >> opened it at all out of respect for you. > > Then I shall not trouble you further with having to open and read parts of my > messages. Trying to reason with you on this matter has proven a pointless > exercise in temporal wasteature. > > _______________________________________________ > Speakup mailing list > Speakup@braille.uwo.ca > http://speech.braille.uwo.ca/mailman/listinfo/speakup >