From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from ip15.shellworld.net ([64.49.204.174] helo=server2.shellworld.net ident=root) by speech.braille.uwo.ca with esmtp (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 1CC4P9-0003UB-00 for ; Mon, 27 Sep 2004 18:55:35 -0400 Received: from server2.shellworld.net (klewellen@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by server2.shellworld.net (8.12.10/8.12.8) with ESMTP id i8RMtZEo014694 for ; Mon, 27 Sep 2004 22:55:35 GMT (envelope-from klewellen@shellworld.net) Received: from localhost (klewellen@localhost) by server2.shellworld.net (8.12.10/8.12.8/Submit) with ESMTP id i8RMtYsK014691 for ; Mon, 27 Sep 2004 18:55:35 -0400 (EDT) X-Authentication-Warning: server2.shellworld.net: klewellen owned process doing -bs Date: Mon, 27 Sep 2004 18:55:34 -0400 (EDT) From: Karen Lewellen To: "Speakup is a screen review system for Linux." In-Reply-To: <20040927210218.GE7962@rednote.net> Message-ID: References: <20040920191737.GA6381@lnx3.holmesgrown.com> <20040927181323.GJ7958@rednote.net> <20040927210218.GE7962@rednote.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Subject: Re: Linux and data storage? X-BeenThere: speakup@braille.uwo.ca X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: "Speakup is a screen review system for Linux." List-Id: "Speakup is a screen review system for Linux." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 27 Sep 2004 22:55:35 -0000 Again you are incorrect. kwota was far more informative than du was in any case. again you are not knowledgeable as to shellworld's specific setup to contribute to this in my opinion. Its my data, so my opinion is what matters in the long run grin. Karen On Mon, 27 Sep 2004, Janina Sajka wrote: > Yes, Luke was just point out that -m is not available on BSD. > > But, you probably do have: > > du --help > > You should check from your prompt on shell world, but I suspect you can > just do: > > du -s > > and get a result in kilobytes. The -m just gives the result in > megabytes.. > > But, having also myself just looked at du --help, I can now ammend > something else I just said a minute ago. Instead of subtracting a total > for mail, do: > > du -s -x mail/ > > to exclude the mail directory from the calculations. > > So, get anything better with these commands? > > Karen Lewellen writes: >> Janina, >> We shall not see quite yet grin. It seems that there is no -m option in >> our edition of the "du" program. >> I ran it in this way: >> du -ms >> I was told that following: >> illegal usage du -m >> with a list of other command line options. >> I have asked our system administrator how the program works for us. >> Karen > > _______________________________________________ > Speakup mailing list > Speakup@braille.uwo.ca > http://speech.braille.uwo.ca/mailman/listinfo/speakup >