From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from ip15.shellworld.net ([64.49.204.174] helo=server2.shellworld.net ident=root) by speech.braille.uwo.ca with esmtp (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 1CC2Ws-0007nf-00 for ; Mon, 27 Sep 2004 16:55:26 -0400 Received: from server2.shellworld.net (ldavis@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by server2.shellworld.net (8.12.10/8.12.8) with ESMTP id i8RKtPEo006919 for ; Mon, 27 Sep 2004 20:55:25 GMT (envelope-from ldavis@shellworld.net) Received: from localhost (ldavis@localhost) by server2.shellworld.net (8.12.10/8.12.8/Submit) with ESMTP id i8RKtPdE006916 for ; Mon, 27 Sep 2004 15:55:25 -0500 (CDT) X-Authentication-Warning: server2.shellworld.net: ldavis owned process doing -bs Date: Mon, 27 Sep 2004 15:55:25 -0500 (CDT) From: Luke Davis To: "Speakup is a screen review system for Linux." In-Reply-To: <20040927203737.GY7958@rednote.net> Message-ID: References: <20040927181503.GK7958@rednote.net> <200409271828.i8RISX4J028479@ms-smtp-02-eri0.southeast.rr.com> <20040927185029.GS7958@rednote.net> <20040927203737.GY7958@rednote.net> Organization: "Tacticus Communications, Inc." MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Subject: Re: Linux and data storage? X-BeenThere: speakup@braille.uwo.ca X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: "Speakup is a screen review system for Linux." List-Id: "Speakup is a screen review system for Linux." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 27 Sep 2004 20:55:26 -0000 On Mon, 27 Sep 2004, Janina Sajka wrote: > I think you misread me, then. I did say how to do it in Linux. I said > rsync would be preferred. I also talked about ftp, particularly the bg > facility of ncftp. My bad, then. If Rsync can do what ever kind of transfers are done by the windows app mentioned, then fine. > Besides, she asked whether it was easy to do in Linux. That would make a > Windows suggestion unresponsive at best. I saw no Windows suggestion. This is pointless. > So, Luke, have you canvased all readers of the list to isolate me as the > only one who misunderstood? Bunk. No, I have canvased all responders, by their public comments.