From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from ip15.shellworld.net ([64.49.204.174] helo=server2.shellworld.net ident=root) by speech.braille.uwo.ca with esmtp (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 1CC2CT-0006fE-00 for ; Mon, 27 Sep 2004 16:34:21 -0400 Received: from server2.shellworld.net (ldavis@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by server2.shellworld.net (8.12.10/8.12.8) with ESMTP id i8RKYJEo005427 for ; Mon, 27 Sep 2004 20:34:19 GMT (envelope-from ldavis@shellworld.net) Received: from localhost (ldavis@localhost) by server2.shellworld.net (8.12.10/8.12.8/Submit) with ESMTP id i8RKYJOk005424 for ; Mon, 27 Sep 2004 15:34:19 -0500 (CDT) X-Authentication-Warning: server2.shellworld.net: ldavis owned process doing -bs Date: Mon, 27 Sep 2004 15:34:19 -0500 (CDT) From: Luke Davis To: "Speakup is a screen review system for Linux." In-Reply-To: <20040927185029.GS7958@rednote.net> Message-ID: References: <20040927181503.GK7958@rednote.net> <200409271828.i8RISX4J028479@ms-smtp-02-eri0.southeast.rr.com> <20040927185029.GS7958@rednote.net> Organization: "Tacticus Communications, Inc." MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Subject: Re: Linux and data storage? X-BeenThere: speakup@braille.uwo.ca X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: "Speakup is a screen review system for Linux." List-Id: "Speakup is a screen review system for Linux." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 27 Sep 2004 20:34:21 -0000 Janina Sina did not suggest use of windows. He said, that windows can do this: how is it done in Linux? Your condecention and insults, were not called for in this case, Janina--you misread his original message. You are the only one who thought he suggested using Windows. I also notice, that, while in your bluster, you state the inferiority of Windows, and the application mentioned, you never answered Sina's question, about how it is done in Linux. Saying something is so, and being unable or unwilling to explain it, serves absolutely no purpose. Is it possible that you could have been at fault here, not Sina? On Mon, 27 Sep 2004, Janina Sajka wrote: > Frankly, Sina, I really don't care whether you like my posts or not. > > Point is, your advice isn't very good in this instance, to put it > bluntly.