From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from ip15.shellworld.net
	([64.49.204.174] helo=server2.shellworld.net ident=root)
	by speech.braille.uwo.ca with esmtp (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian))
	id 1BhBy0-0006bB-00
	for <speakup@braille.uwo.ca>; Sun, 04 Jul 2004 14:43:56 -0400
Received: from server2.shellworld.net (jdashiel@localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by server2.shellworld.net (8.12.10/8.12.8) with ESMTP id i64Iht0S000226
	for <speakup@braille.uwo.ca>; Sun, 4 Jul 2004 18:43:55 GMT
	(envelope-from jdashiel@shellworld.net)
Received: from localhost (jdashiel@localhost)
	by server2.shellworld.net (8.12.10/8.12.8/Submit) with ESMTP id
	i64Ihtq8000223
	for <speakup@braille.uwo.ca>; Sun, 4 Jul 2004 14:43:55 -0400 (EDT)
X-Authentication-Warning: server2.shellworld.net: jdashiel owned process doing
	-bs
Date: Sun, 4 Jul 2004 14:43:55 -0400 (EDT)
From: Jude DaShiell <jdashiel@shellworld.net>
To: speakup@braille.uwo.ca
Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.60.0407041440050.99828@server2.shellworld.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed
Subject: broadband cable throughput quality
X-BeenThere: speakup@braille.uwo.ca
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.4
Precedence: list
Reply-To: "Speakup is a screen review system for Linux."
	<speakup@braille.uwo.ca>
List-Id: "Speakup is a screen review system for Linux."
	<speakup.braille.uwo.ca>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://speech.braille.uwo.ca/mailman/listinfo/speakup>,
	<mailto:speakup-request@braille.uwo.ca?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://braille.uwo.ca/pipermail/speakup>
List-Post: <mailto:speakup@braille.uwo.ca>
List-Help: <mailto:speakup-request@braille.uwo.ca?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://speech.braille.uwo.ca/mailman/listinfo/speakup>,
	<mailto:speakup-request@braille.uwo.ca?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 04 Jul 2004 18:43:57 -0000

Setting the propaganda aside what kind of quality for cable modem 
downloaads is actually offered?  If the quality is less than effective 
what needs to be done by users to get it improved?