From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from shellworld.net ([209.61.182.169] helo=server2.shellworld.net ident=root) by speech.braille.uwo.ca with esmtp (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 1AKY91-0005bD-00 for ; Fri, 14 Nov 2003 02:13:27 -0500 Received: from server2.shellworld.net (ldavis@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by server2.shellworld.net (8.12.10/8.12.8) with ESMTP id hAE7DQQe080192 for ; Fri, 14 Nov 2003 07:13:26 GMT (envelope-from ldavis@shellworld.net) Received: from localhost (ldavis@localhost) by server2.shellworld.net (8.12.10/8.12.8/Submit) with ESMTP id hAE7DQ8V080188 for ; Fri, 14 Nov 2003 07:13:26 GMT X-Authentication-Warning: server2.shellworld.net: ldavis owned process doing -bs Date: Fri, 14 Nov 2003 07:13:26 +0000 (GMT) From: Luke Davis To: "Speakup is a screen review system for Linux." In-Reply-To: <20031113225839.GA9654@romuald.net.eu.org> Message-ID: References: <20031113225839.GA9654@romuald.net.eu.org> Organization: "Tacticus Communications, Inc." MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Subject: 2.4.22 X-BeenThere: speakup@braille.uwo.ca X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.3 Precedence: list Reply-To: "Speakup is a screen review system for Linux." List-Id: Speakup is a screen review system for Linux. List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 14 Nov 2003 07:13:27 -0000 Does anyone else hold this opinion (that 2.4.22 is crap)? I am in the processof compiling it on a live commercial server, and would like opinions of this. Luke On Thu, 13 Nov 2003, Gregory Nowak wrote: > Hi all. > > The subject says it all. I went back to linux 2.4.21, and the box > works like a charm. No segmentation faults, no inactivity for long > periods, it's all gone. > > Thanks to all who provided suggestions/help, but in the end it turned > out that 2.4.22 is a piece of crap. > That's my personal opinion, which I have the right to state, so no > flames please. > > Greg > > >