From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from server1.shellworld.net ([64.39.15.178] ident=root)
	by speech.braille.uwo.ca with esmtp (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian))
	id 1AFpiP-0002T8-00
	for <speakup@braille.uwo.ca>; Sat, 01 Nov 2003 01:58:29 -0500
Received: from server1.shellworld.net (ldavis@localhost.shellworld.net
	[127.0.0.1])
	by server1.shellworld.net (8.12.8/8.11.1) with ESMTP id hA16wTwO033462
	for <speakup@braille.uwo.ca>; Sat, 1 Nov 2003 00:58:29 -0600 (CST)
	(envelope-from ldavis@shellworld.net)
Received: from localhost (ldavis@localhost)
	by server1.shellworld.net (8.12.8/8.12.8/Submit) with ESMTP id
	hA16wTwB033459
	for <speakup@braille.uwo.ca>; Sat, 1 Nov 2003 00:58:29 -0600 (CST)
	(envelope-from ldavis@shellworld.net)
X-Authentication-Warning: server1.shellworld.net: ldavis owned process doing
	-bs
Date: Sat, 1 Nov 2003 00:58:29 -0600 (CST)
From: Luke Davis <ldavis@shellworld.net>
To: "Speakup is a screen review system for Linux." <speakup@braille.uwo.ca>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.58.0310312129590.13219@wb2flw.octothorp.org>
Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.58.0311010055400.10744@server1.shellworld.net>
References: <Pine.LNX.4.58.0310312129590.13219@wb2flw.octothorp.org>
Organization: "Tacticus Communications, Inc."
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Subject: Re: Possible Mailman configuration problem on this list?
X-BeenThere: speakup@braille.uwo.ca
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.3
Precedence: list
Reply-To: "Speakup is a screen review system for Linux."
	<speakup@braille.uwo.ca>
List-Id: Speakup is a screen review system for Linux.
	<speakup.braille.uwo.ca>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://speech.braille.uwo.ca/mailman/listinfo/speakup>,
	<mailto:speakup-request@braille.uwo.ca?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://braille.uwo.ca/pipermail/speakup>
List-Post: <mailto:speakup@braille.uwo.ca>
List-Help: <mailto:speakup-request@braille.uwo.ca?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://speech.braille.uwo.ca/mailman/listinfo/speakup>,
	<mailto:speakup-request@braille.uwo.ca?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 01 Nov 2003 06:58:29 -0000

Hmm.
You're correct, that I didn't intentionally do that.  I just tested a bit,
and found that when choosing to use reply-to instead of from, I did not
get what you say you get.
I went ahead with that, and tthense came this message, with only the list
as the recipient.

I am using pine 4.58.

Luke

 On Fri, 31 Oct 2003, William F. Acker WB2FLW
+1-303-722-7209 wrote:

> Hi all,
>
>      I notice that when Luke replied to Rejean, Rejean got a copy, as well
> as the list.  It isn't very likely that Luke meant to do that.  So, using
> Pine, I hit R, was asked the usual question about including the text of
> the message being replied to, prompted whether I wanted to use the
> reply-to address rather than the From: address, I said yes.  Usually, that
> would be that, but I was then asked if I wanted to reply to all
> recipients.  Normally, I only get prompted for that if I say no to the
> previous prompt about using the reply-to address.
>
>      What y'all think?
>