From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from redstripe.fhda.edu ([153.18.96.108]) by speech.braille.uwo.ca with esmtp (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 1BYTdZ-0005zH-00 for ; Thu, 10 Jun 2004 13:46:49 -0400 Received: from ATTC51 ([153.18.19.204]) by redstripe.fhda.edu (8.9.3/8.9.1) with SMTP id KAA386596 for ; Thu, 10 Jun 2004 10:41:48 -0700 (PDT) From: "Debee Norling" To: "Speakup is a screen review system for Linux." Date: Thu, 10 Jun 2004 10:46:30 -0700 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2911.0) X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 Importance: Normal Subject: DoubleTalk LT, LiteTalk, Q-Talk X-BeenThere: speakup@braille.uwo.ca X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.4 Precedence: list Reply-To: norlingdeborah@fhda.edu, "Speakup is a screen review system for Linux." List-Id: "Speakup is a screen review system for Linux." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 10 Jun 2004 17:46:49 -0000 Can someone describe what's different between these three synthesizers. They all are advertised as running on batteries and being small. DoubleTalk LT and Q-talk can both be easily bought online, but I can't compare prices because one is American and one Australian currency. And what about the LiteTalk? Is it still available? And it appears all three are based on the same RC Systems chipset, is that right? --Debee