From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by befuddled.reisers.ca (Postfix, from userid 65534) id 55DA11EFE09; Mon, 26 Dec 2016 11:02:28 -0500 (EST) Received: from mail-wm0-x244.google.com (mail-wm0-x244.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c09::244]) by befuddled.reisers.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 523841EFE01 for ; Mon, 26 Dec 2016 11:02:25 -0500 (EST) Received: by mail-wm0-x244.google.com with SMTP id l2so28066456wml.2 for ; Mon, 26 Dec 2016 08:02:25 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=efNSFPrDxiiiVITQvIDio8cQJtMxfq1fQ1YJnhQ8waY=; b=TaFpJFynjox1Z0N2PrdE6Q1jGQ7M91o6n8dXg7FofOkKw8S4MPOihWvJqPj5rTokvR lBI/FN97HH5gG0i7xtXmEacrUNMIc+k2FBPf0hFCHytgqBXVk5Zr9aYlYs9sNtjkAfcW BJvyBNhMNNXmhPtAyFp7A0FktMPetPCz5LwnhWnXzXdJpA12ienPxhXDrkh97ixXWsHr a4NG+IMf1rJBQ3q3bComONFXH6hE/gdvyT2hpfTI1K+EesoxVXaKmQT4HgBwjE27bLnA LRXxIPeKxmKs+0mZC1umIpRqS6AouqN4WpDKOOBZ2C22WVcY9zJMn8M6rtimc2CFJsWl Os4A== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=efNSFPrDxiiiVITQvIDio8cQJtMxfq1fQ1YJnhQ8waY=; b=c9DiJU5suu4In1mfXXDCGFpXNSoKcFCP95J/fkMAgkRKt8Rvxcuqzws/1NV3TbLDYo VaottvqTNeHMS4ODATcwaz/zNoagtFmww4GNw7l2K8USQagzZfcJZQXmmHUMN+lT88fZ hqC5cUy2R3C0zcm2hE36QlsT3mXX21JLg88ffWgRmj5InVTE/j6kT3TpYRI60zSDBpXm Qhh0ZCl1bsOmZvOniuVib3pYcJHjZDc+Pr69GkK9nJ4qEE3gOEKMYbHZ4Cmu/v3CICLj WbuLhhKEt3RknDYOL39nFRlx4D2q/+NX3kgGJYs5Nx/RC65pftr5L0cBbWC1hYsywSaX 2yCQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AIkVDXKRBkQVMgYn3paxH0wC0TmEuf97H3o+OXI0WyLeeGBTbxPc0mo2t7T3eNeAynG6ng== X-Received: by 10.28.236.149 with SMTP id h21mr14622792wmi.65.1482768144355; Mon, 26 Dec 2016 08:02:24 -0800 (PST) Received: from [192.168.0.3] (cpc91372-watf11-2-0-cust614.15-2.cable.virginm.net. [86.14.2.103]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id i2sm55444113wjx.44.2016.12.26.08.02.23 (version=TLS1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128/128); Mon, 26 Dec 2016 08:02:23 -0800 (PST) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0) Subject: Re: Line discipline From: Okash Khawaja X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (11A501) In-Reply-To: <20161220010836.GN2895@var.home> Date: Mon, 26 Dec 2016 16:02:23 +0000 Cc: "Speakup is a screen review system for Linux." Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: References: <20161220010836.GN2895@var.home> To: Samuel Thibault X-Bogosity: Ham, tests=bogofilter, spamicity=0.000000, version=1.2.4 X-BeenThere: speakup@linux-speakup.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Speakup is a screen review system for Linux." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 26 Dec 2016 16:02:29 -0000 Thanks. It seems relatively straightforward from here on. Job switch combine= d with an unexpectedly busy holiday period means that I haven't been able to= work on this recently. Things will settle next week when I will be back on i= t.=20 Merry Christmas and happy new year! Okash > On 20 Dec 2016, at 01:08, Samuel Thibault w= rote: >=20 > Okash Khawaja, on Sun 18 Dec 2016 11:24:11 +0000, wrote: >> Now I see three items to address, listed below in no particular order. >>=20 >> 1. Supplying major and minor dev numbers, instead of hardcoding. >=20 > This could be a mere module parameter string that a function turns into > major/minor. Not a big deal :) >=20 >> 2. Integrating the changes into speakup_dummy and testing it. >=20 > Yep! >=20 >> 3. Strategy for kernel patch. Do we try to have it accepted? Not sure if t= here >> is a standard way of addressing it. >=20 > It will never be accepted before step 2. is done. In the end we'll want > to get it accepted, sure, but we have to make speakup able to use it > first, otherwise the kernel patch will be rejected. >=20 > Thanks! > Samuel