From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mailhub-5.iastate.edu (mailhub-5.iastate.edu [129.186.140.15]) by speech.braille.uwo.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id E765510ABF for ; Wed, 23 Sep 2009 13:11:49 -0400 (EDT) Received: from devirus-11.iastate.edu (devirus-11.iastate.edu [129.186.1.48]) by mailhub-5.iastate.edu (8.12.11.20060614/8.12.10) with SMTP id n8NHBn1m031333 for ; Wed, 23 Sep 2009 12:11:49 -0500 Received: from (despam-10.iastate.edu [129.186.140.80]) by devirus-11.iastate.edu with smtp id 4b8a_2e5efa36_a864_11de_a54d_001372578af6; Wed, 23 Sep 2009 12:11:48 -0500 Received: from gene3.ait.iastate.edu (gene3.ait.iastate.edu [129.186.144.105]) by despam-10.iastate.edu (8.14.2/8.12.10) with ESMTP id n8NHBmEB002062 for ; Wed, 23 Sep 2009 12:11:48 -0500 Received: from collins (helo=gene3.ait.iastate.edu) by gene3.ait.iastate.edu with local-esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1MqVMK-0001IS-U8 for speakup@braille.uwo.ca; Wed, 23 Sep 2009 12:10:29 -0500 To: "Speakup is a screen review system for Linux." Subject: Re: espeakup under debian is screwed In-reply-to: Your message of Wed, 23 Sep 2009 12:09:08 -0500. <20090923170908.GA17193@linux1> Date: Wed, 23 Sep 2009 12:10:28 -0500 From: "Gene Collins" Message-Id: X-Spam-flag: _YESNOCAPS_ X-Spam_score: -0.0 X-Spam_score_int: 0 X-Spam_bar: / X-Spam_report: Spam detection software, running on the system "gene3.ait.iastate.edu", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: I would think not, William, since it makes it easier for newbees to get espeakup. Gene >-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- >Hash: SHA1 > >On Wed, Sep 23, 2009 at 06:28:09PM +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote: >> William Hubbs, le Wed 23 Sep 2009 11:21:04 -0500, a ?crit : >> > I'm also concerned about this, because there is no espeakup 3.1.3. The >> > latest version of espeakup which is released is 0.71. >> >> But they are in the same upstream package, thus the same version. > > No, espeakup is a separate upstream package at version 0.71. >The only reason it is in the "contrib" directory of speakup is that Kirk >suggested this as an easy way to distribute espeakup. > > The home page for espeakup is on github at > http://www.github.com/williamh/espeakup, and the tarball of the current > release is currently hosted on linux-speakup.org and distributed in the > contrib directory of speakup. > > Should I remove it from the contrib directory to eliminate confusion? > > Thanks, > > William >-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- >Version: GnuPG v2.0.11 (GNU/Linux) > >iEYEARECAAYFAkq6VjQACgkQblQW9DDEZTjvcgCfV4FcHKXhz3ogO6HH6As3gy+s >PMAAoLbtt8+jLWQaFF1gpNsJn9NmBHhm >=J41v >-----END PGP SIGNATURE----- > >Speakup mailing list >Speakup@braille.uwo.ca >http://speech.braille.uwo.ca/mailman/listinfo/speakup [...] Content analysis details: (-0.0 points, 3.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 NO_RELAYS Informational: message was not relayed via SMTP X-PMX-Version: 5.5.3.366731, Antispam-Engine: 2.7.0.366912, Antispam-Data: 2009.9.23.170037 X-ISUMailhub-test: Gauge=IIIIIII, Probability=8%, Report='BODY_SIZE_1300_1399 0, BODY_SIZE_2000_LESS 0, BODY_SIZE_5000_LESS 0, BODY_SIZE_7000_LESS 0, __BOUNCE_CHALLENGE_SUBJ 0, __CP_URI_IN_BODY 0, __HAS_MSGID 0, __LINES_OF_YELLING 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0' X-BeenThere: speakup@braille.uwo.ca X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list Reply-To: "Speakup is a screen review system for Linux." List-Id: "Speakup is a screen review system for Linux." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 23 Sep 2009 17:11:50 -0000 I would think not, William, since it makes it easier for newbees to get espeakup. Gene >-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- >Hash: SHA1 > >On Wed, Sep 23, 2009 at 06:28:09PM +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote: >> William Hubbs, le Wed 23 Sep 2009 11:21:04 -0500, a ?crit : >> > I'm also concerned about this, because there is no espeakup 3.1.3. The >> > latest version of espeakup which is released is 0.71. >> >> But they are in the same upstream package, thus the same version. > > No, espeakup is a separate upstream package at version 0.71. >The only reason it is in the "contrib" directory of speakup is that Kirk >suggested this as an easy way to distribute espeakup. > > The home page for espeakup is on github at > http://www.github.com/williamh/espeakup, and the tarball of the current > release is currently hosted on linux-speakup.org and distributed in the > contrib directory of speakup. > > Should I remove it from the contrib directory to eliminate confusion? > > Thanks, > > William >-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- >Version: GnuPG v2.0.11 (GNU/Linux) > >iEYEARECAAYFAkq6VjQACgkQblQW9DDEZTjvcgCfV4FcHKXhz3ogO6HH6As3gy+s >PMAAoLbtt8+jLWQaFF1gpNsJn9NmBHhm >=J41v >-----END PGP SIGNATURE----- >_______________________________________________ >Speakup mailing list >Speakup@braille.uwo.ca >http://speech.braille.uwo.ca/mailman/listinfo/speakup