From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from iseult.blacknight.ie (iseult.blacknight.ie [81.17.252.70]) by speech.braille.uwo.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id E5E4D109C7 for ; Thu, 15 May 2008 10:20:50 -0400 (EDT) Received: from [78.16.225.237] (helo=digitaldarragh.com) by iseult.blacknight.ie with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1JweJn-0008RD-R3 for speakup@braille.uwo.ca; Thu, 15 May 2008 15:20:30 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----_=_NextPart_001_01C8B696.CE420CD8" Date: Thu, 15 May 2008 15:17:38 +0100 Content-class: urn:content-classes:message Message-ID: X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5.7235.2 X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: Do Speakup and Orca play together nicely now? thread-index: Aci2lALdxUT49yhWQTCdEaDuUWil1QAAmrhz References: <000001c8b5ce$cbae5730$378f9643@hoff9cuf06jek6> <6B638DB18B0840BAA4330352EE7E3DF0@digitaldarragh.local> From: "Darragh" To: "Speakup is a screen review system for Linux." X-blacknight-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-blacknight-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-blacknight-MailScanner-From: lists@digitaldarragh.com Subject: Do Speakup and Orca play together nicely now? X-Spam-Status: No X-BeenThere: speakup@braille.uwo.ca X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.10 Precedence: list Reply-To: "Speakup is a screen review system for Linux." List-Id: "Speakup is a screen review system for Linux." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 15 May 2008 14:20:51 -0000 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------_=_NextPart_001_01C8B696.CE420CD8 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Greetings all,=20 I'm thinking of doing some work with Fedora 9. It's downloading at the mom= ent so.... who knows.=20 My only question for the moment is, when I used V7 with the excelent TTSynt= h synthesizer for both Speakup and Orca, there were a few problems. Pluss,= Speakup didn't let go of the num pad when in Gnome so that caused all sort= s of work arounds and problems.=20 Is this still the case in version 9?=20 Thanks Darragh =D3 H=E9iligh www.digitaldarragh.com ------_=_NextPart_001_01C8B696.CE420CD8--