From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-yw0-f49.google.com (mail-yw0-f49.google.com [209.85.213.49]) by speech.braille.uwo.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id D38A8C1A069 for ; Tue, 4 Sep 2012 14:25:02 -0400 (EDT) Received: by yhjj52 with SMTP id j52so1445789yhj.22 for ; Tue, 04 Sep 2012 11:25:02 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=references:user-agent:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:subject:from:date:to:message-id; bh=B2aVSCW4llxK2SvJdF6tms/jUWZsRNzO/qeZmLPglUI=; b=ihASgWNV8acjNaoEFn7m4bfa21ii17tNiEfUEkqMIUb9Fst3h9vpbSCnT0oLDZOFVn qCoUTl7FSTV4UjuQ/BGmvUXLgZ0UdE9aRbhS7Gvvg/A0ZkfhpQsg7bPTSMi9vaWAIWHF AuVnoJ0tfxctBoOx+WUmY1BVgLwn9chn3NSjtoe+w832UcM1R+JaCA73VRQVgsK1uStM nD8P8pm7Li8+gC/zqPxYLRs2Qf4O/bdBDHdynIgSxBTTaK3w9Ivuui8sybZzuJPzKKSH ITeHxltXsq9nlM/loH9lhySmc2vCEtlPfx/iGjN7IiNN7bxNb0oknenLFIQ4VYsutOTC Vrig== Received: by 10.52.94.179 with SMTP id dd19mr13616848vdb.123.1346783101103; Tue, 04 Sep 2012 11:25:01 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.2.7] (cpe-024-211-185-030.nc.res.rr.com. [24.211.185.30]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id j13sm6453349vej.3.2012.09.04.11.24.59 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Tue, 04 Sep 2012 11:25:00 -0700 (PDT) References: User-Agent: K-9 Mail for Android In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Subject: Re: experimental js and ajax capable text browser From: Kyle Date: Tue, 04 Sep 2012 14:24:51 -0400 To: "Speakup is a screen review system for Linux." Message-ID: <740656c3-2d5f-4ae9-807d-e88757e275c5@email.android.com> X-BeenThere: speakup@braille.uwo.ca X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list Reply-To: "Speakup is a screen review system for Linux." List-Id: "Speakup is a screen review system for Linux." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 04 Sep 2012 18:25:03 -0000 This certainly sounds like an interesting project. As for packaging, I'll take a look, as I should be able to easily write a PKGBUILD for the Arch User Repository. As for a license, my personal favorite, which I use for any code I write is http://unlicense.org Having said this, any existing free software license would be beneficial to the community of both users and developers. As the Arch PKGBUILD specification requires a license field to be filled in, I would feel more comfortable with packaging if the project already has a license. ~Kyle -- Kyle is a droid. The whole world knows it This e-mail shows it.