From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from gate1.cherrypoint.usmc.mil ([192.156.73.34]) by speech.braille.uwo.ca with esmtp (Exim 3.32 #1 (Debian)) id 15o8oo-0006Ev-00 for ; Mon, 01 Oct 2001 15:33:35 -0400 Received: by gate1.cherrypoint.usmc.mil; id TAA27587; Mon, 1 Oct 2001 19:33:02 GMT Received: from unknown(158.245.64.141) by gate1.cherrypoint.usmc.mil via smap (V5.5) id xma027567; Mon, 1 Oct 01 19:32:28 GMT Received: by chpt0000sebh.cherrypoint.usmc.mil with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) id ; Mon, 1 Oct 2001 15:30:26 -0400 Message-ID: <6D3A09C6CAB0D311BA5000902760D02284F8B7@chpt0000se01.cherrypoint.usmc.mil> From: Whitley GS11 Cecil H To: "'speakup@braille.uwo.ca'" Subject: RE: strange question Date: Mon, 1 Oct 2001 15:30:22 -0400 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) Sender: speakup-admin@braille.uwo.ca Errors-To: speakup-admin@braille.uwo.ca X-BeenThere: speakup@braille.uwo.ca X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.6 Precedence: bulk Reply-To: speakup@braille.uwo.ca List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Speakup is a screen review system for Linux. List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Hi, I just joined the list today. In reviewing the last month I noticed this thread. I use open ssh that comes with the cygwin distribution. It works well for me. I am running nt 4.0 with jaws. On the unix/linux side I maintain five solaris 2.6 boxes and one rh 7.1 box running squid. It will soon be two, and maybe even a third as m.s. proxy goes in the dustbin. I have been very interested in speakup, but haven't installed it yet. My holdup is determining which machine (desktop or laptop) and not wantin to o through the pain of re-partitioning. Since I run NT on the desktop, i'll have to repartition in order to load it there, but that avoids the laptop keyboard limitation issues, not to mention pcmcia. Why redhat? That's the flavor that dell supports on their servers when you call in hardware issues. The thought of building my own kernel gives me nightmares! Okay, so that's a dos-ism..... I'll get over it. For ya'll whom are running redhat, is 2.4.3-12 advisable? Regards, Cecil