From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from ip15.shellworld.net ([64.49.204.174] helo=server2.shellworld.net ident=root) by speech.braille.uwo.ca with esmtp (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 1EMcNK-0001Mp-00 for ; Mon, 03 Oct 2005 22:17:50 -0400 Received: from cyndi.freedomchat.org (d0.as1.dytn.oh.core.com [207.90.102.1]) by server2.shellworld.net (8.12.10/8.12.8) with ESMTP id j942Hk7o093844 for ; Tue, 4 Oct 2005 02:17:47 GMT (envelope-from ace@freedomchat.org) Message-Id: <6.2.5.6.0.20051003221551.0365c390@freedomchat.org> X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6.2.5.6 Date: Mon, 03 Oct 2005 22:17:39 -0400 To: "Speakup is a screen review system for Linux." From: ace In-Reply-To: <95D3966E-AA6C-4CC5-8958-FB4AD3B6DB06@adelphia.net> References: <000001c5c7d7$a1ac8020$6701a8c0@QUARK> <95D3966E-AA6C-4CC5-8958-FB4AD3B6DB06@adelphia.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed X-Antivirus: avast! (VPS 0539-6, 10/02/2005), Outbound message X-Antivirus-Status: Clean Subject: Re: Speakup in user space, why or why not? X-BeenThere: speakup@braille.uwo.ca X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: "Speakup is a screen review system for Linux." List-Id: "Speakup is a screen review system for Linux." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 04 Oct 2005 02:17:50 -0000 Personally, I think you all took Sina the wrong way. You lot seem to be overlooking his/her point completely. He/she was looking for information. Simply that. Searching for information. Knowledge. To be educated. Not for when such a project can be done or who will do it. I understood your point entirely, Sina. At 06:12 PM 10/3/2005, you wrote: >Naaaaa, Gene's message was not imature or any such thing, I think you >missed the point and didn't read the entire message. What he was >saying in a much longer version than I would have is this. > >You want it, find someone or do it yourself. If Kirk or anyone else >wanted to do this, you bet it would have been done. >So, there's the short version. Its possible, but no one is interested >in doing it. I think that sums it up real nice. Gee I think Gene said >it nicer than I. >Btw, I think Gene was quite adult about the entire message her wrote, >I think you simply took it the wrong way. > > >On Oct 3, 2005, at 1:02 AM, Sina Bahram wrote: > >>Hi Gene, >> >>I have asked a ligitamet question for the purpose of knowledge and >>open >>discussion ... A wonderful bit of which has happened already. >> >>Yet I receive this email from you that wishes to accuse. Frankly, I >>don't >>have time to ask loaded questions, so if I'm asking, it means I >>want to >>know. >> >>I'm sending another email with my answers inline, but I find it >>quite sad >>that you have sent such an immature response to a ligitamet >>question that >>the rest of us are discussing like adults. >> >>Take care, >>Sina > > >_______________________________________________ >Speakup mailing list >Speakup@braille.uwo.ca >http://speech.braille.uwo.ca/mailman/listinfo/speakup