From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by befuddled.reisers.ca (Postfix, from userid 65534) id E525D1EFD6B; Tue, 15 Nov 2016 13:26:46 -0500 (EST) Received: from smtpauth4.wiscmail.wisc.edu (wmauth4.doit.wisc.edu [144.92.197.145]) by befuddled.reisers.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2C2DA1EFCCA for ; Tue, 15 Nov 2016 13:26:46 -0500 (EST) MIME-version: 1.0 Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT Content-type: text/plain; CHARSET=US-ASCII; format=flowed Received: from avs-daemon.smtpauth4.wiscmail.wisc.edu by smtpauth4.wiscmail.wisc.edu (Oracle Communications Messaging Server 7.0.5.37.0 64bit (built Jan 25 2016)) id <0OGP00M00416DN00@smtpauth4.wiscmail.wisc.edu> for speakup@linux-speakup.org; Tue, 15 Nov 2016 12:26:45 -0600 (CST) X-Spam-PmxInfo: Server=avs-4, Version=6.3.0.2556906, Antispam-Engine: 2.7.2.2107409, Antispam-Data: 2016.11.15.182116, SenderIP=144.92.166.70 X-Spam-Report: AuthenticatedSender=yes, SenderIP=144.92.166.70 Received: from [144.92.166.70] (vv507j.math.wisc.edu [144.92.166.70]) by smtpauth4.wiscmail.wisc.edu (Oracle Communications Messaging Server 7.0.5.37.0 64bit (built Jan 25 2016)) with ESMTPSA id <0OGP00BQS4KL3530@smtpauth4.wiscmail.wisc.edu> for speakup@linux-speakup.org; Tue, 15 Nov 2016 12:26:45 -0600 (CST) Reply-to: jheim@math.wisc.edu Subject: Re: Status of kernel References: <20161111162750.GK2417@var.home> <20161111163209.GV2417@var.home> <20161112154759.GP2417@var.home> <20161112221844.GK2417@var.home> <20161113221139.GZ18437@var.home> <582B40D4.1000900@verizon.net> <20161115171332.GW3058@var.labri.fr> To: "Speakup is a screen review system for Linux." From: John G Heim Message-id: <5d704df1-b24c-875d-e5b2-f95c66281cf6@math.wisc.edu> Date: Tue, 15 Nov 2016 12:26:45 -0600 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.4.0 In-reply-to: <20161115171332.GW3058@var.labri.fr> X-Bogosity: Ham, tests=bogofilter, spamicity=0.000000, version=1.2.4 X-BeenThere: speakup@linux-speakup.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Speakup is a screen review system for Linux." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 15 Nov 2016 18:26:47 -0000 On 11/15/2016 11:13 AM, Samuel Thibault wrote: > Al Sten-Clanton, on Tue 15 Nov 2016 12:07:32 -0500, wrote: >> Would it wreck the kernel or something? > Yes. > >> Alternatively, is using usb prots not a good option? > It's exactly the same issue. What is exactly the same problem?