From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by befuddled.reisers.ca (Postfix, from userid 65534) id 7676E1EFD63; Tue, 15 Nov 2016 12:07:48 -0500 (EST) Received: from vms173009pub.verizon.net (vms173009pub.verizon.net [206.46.173.9]) by befuddled.reisers.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 80A871EFD2A for ; Tue, 15 Nov 2016 12:07:46 -0500 (EST) Received: from vz-proxy-l001.mx.aol.com ([64.236.82.153]) by vms173009.mailsrvcs.net (Oracle Communications Messaging Server 7.0.5.32.0 64bit (built Jul 16 2014)) with ESMTPA id <0OGP00DU30WLOW80@vms173009.mailsrvcs.net> for speakup@linux-speakup.org; Tue, 15 Nov 2016 11:07:33 -0600 (CST) X-CMAE-Score: 0 X-CMAE-Analysis: v=2.2 cv=daDw5Tfe c=1 sm=1 tr=0 a=FJ1kTJ0/xm5uTekQe8vMdQ==:117 a=IkcTkHD0fZMA:10 a=L24OOQBejmoA:10 a=qPKtzgQbAAAA:8 a=K02kutNkqOGe1yRC9hgA:9 a=QEXdDO2ut3YA:10 Received: by 71.174.190.247 with SMTP id 7aa41731; Tue, 15 Nov 2016 17:07:33 GMT Subject: Re: Status of kernel To: "Speakup is a screen review system for Linux." References: <20161111083447.GE2417@var.home> <20161111162750.GK2417@var.home> <20161111163209.GV2417@var.home> <20161112154759.GP2417@var.home> <20161112221844.GK2417@var.home> <20161113221139.GZ18437@var.home> From: Al Sten-Clanton Message-id: <582B40D4.1000900@verizon.net> Date: Tue, 15 Nov 2016 12:07:32 -0500 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.4.0 MIME-version: 1.0 In-reply-to: <20161113221139.GZ18437@var.home> Content-type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit X-Bogosity: Ham, tests=bogofilter, spamicity=0.000000, version=1.2.4 X-BeenThere: speakup@linux-speakup.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Speakup is a screen review system for Linux." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 15 Nov 2016 17:07:48 -0000 qUOTING sAMUEL tHIBAULT, "Because there is special plumbing between the serial console and the serial drivers. Doing the same plumbing between speakup and serial drivers would be very very frowned upon." i WONDER IF WE SHOULD FROWN UPON THE FROWNERS AND TRY TO GET IT DONE, AS HARDWARE SPEECH WOULD HELP A LOT. wOULD IT WRECK THE KERNEL OR SOMETHING? aLTERNATIVELY, IS USING USB PROTS NOT A GOOD OPTION? i'VE FINALLY DECIDED TO TRY TO LEARN c, HOPING i MIGHT KNOW ENOUGH TO HELP DOWN THE ROAD. iT WILL BE A WHILE EVEN AT BEST BEFORE i CAN BE USEFUL, SO MAYBE IT WON'T MATTER BY THEN, BUT i'D LIKE TO DO MORE THAN COMPLAIN. tHANKS FOR ANY THOUGHTS. aL On 11/13/2016 05:11 PM, Samuel Thibault wrote: > John G. Heim, on Sun 13 Nov 2016 16:05:53 -0600, wrote: >> One thing I've never understood is why the kernel can have a serial console >> yet speakup can't talk to the serial port. How does the kernel's serial >> console talk to the serial port? Why can't speakup do the same? > > Because there is special plumbing between the serial console and the > serial drivers. Doing the same plumbing between speakup and serial > drivers would be very very frowned upon. > > Samuel > _______________________________________________ > Speakup mailing list > Speakup@linux-speakup.org > http://linux-speakup.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/speakup >