From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by befuddled.reisers.ca (Postfix, from userid 65534) id 8B11F1EF85E; Mon, 14 Dec 2015 05:53:23 -0500 (EST) Received: from dragnet.batsupport.com (dragnet.batsupport.com [176.9.155.71]) by befuddled.reisers.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 51D571EF858 for ; Mon, 14 Dec 2015 05:53:22 -0500 (EST) Received: from [192.168.0.133] (ip98-176-22-138.sd.sd.cox.net [98.176.22.138]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: bats@batsupport.com) by dragnet.batsupport.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 025321F00693 for ; Mon, 14 Dec 2015 02:53:15 -0800 (PST) Subject: Re: Announcing 32-bit test live CD To: "Speakup is a screen review system for Linux." References: <565ACB1C.8040905@baechler.net> <20151213052255.GA3710@qlf.suddenlink.net> <566D4379.50801@baechler.net> <20151214034539.GA3743@qlf.suddenlink.net> From: Tony Baechler Organization: Baechler Access Technology Services Message-ID: <566E9F98.4070302@baechler.net> Date: Mon, 14 Dec 2015 02:53:12 -0800 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.4.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20151214034539.GA3743@qlf.suddenlink.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Bogosity: Ham, tests=bogofilter, spamicity=0.000000, version=1.2.4 X-BeenThere: speakup@linux-speakup.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: "Speakup is a screen review system for Linux." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 14 Dec 2015 10:53:23 -0000 On 12/13/2015 7:45 PM, Tom Fowle wrote: > Is it worth the fuss to run script and try to copy the results of any > commands to a thumb drive then send em to you? > Happy to try that if might be usefull? Thanks for testing. No, I don't need the script output. It could be a kernel issue. I have a DECtalk Express here, but the last several kernels I've tried lock up when loading the module. > > Have you had anybody else test this with a different hardware synth? No, but see above. I don't think kernel 4.2 supports serial synths. The idea was that most people would use software speech. I don't know why brltty doesn't work and I don't have a display to test. Thanks again for testing, but I think I'm out of ideas. At least it boots on your machine and you have speech.