From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from dukecmmtar03.coxmail.com (dukecmmtar03.coxmail.com [68.99.120.44]) by befuddled.reisers.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 078981EF08B for ; Thu, 16 May 2013 05:08:13 -0400 (EDT) Received: from dukecmimpo03.coxmail.com ([68.99.120.137]) by dukecmmtar03.coxmail.com (InterMail vM.8.01.05.06 201-2260-151-112-20120208) with ESMTP id <20130516090800.NILU13174.dukecmmtar03.coxmail.com@dukecmimpo03.coxmail.com> for ; Thu, 16 May 2013 05:08:00 -0400 Received: from [192.168.0.102] ([70.166.17.50]) by dukecmimpo03.coxmail.com with bizsmtp id cZ801l00214oyBJ01Z80hN; Thu, 16 May 2013 05:08:00 -0400 Message-ID: <5194A1E8.2070300@baechler.net> Date: Thu, 16 May 2013 02:07:52 -0700 From: Tony Baechler User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130509 Thunderbird/17.0.6 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Speakup is a screen review system for Linux." Subject: Serial ports with 32-bit vs. 64-bit processors References: <8F6D9D72964E4D2E90262B7DB242EE9D@mdlynn> <5191FF80.1030802@baechler.net> <51933C1C.9070201@baechler.net> <72708A629D1C40508DEB3147F83238DA@mdlynn> <51939D80.3050903@baechler.net> <18019.1368635999@ccs.covici.com> In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 1.5.1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: speakup@linux-speakup.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list Reply-To: "Speakup is a screen review system for Linux." List-Id: "Speakup is a screen review system for Linux." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 16 May 2013 09:08:15 -0000 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256 Ah, that's what I've been wondering about. I've asked various people here who claim to have working hardware speech, but never got a response. My question is if they're running 32-bit or not. I can not only confirm that it won't work on 64-bit systems but if I try to unload speakup_soft and load speakup_ltlk, it completely locks up the system. Someone else said they didn't have any problem with serial speech with new kernels and a 32-bit processor, but I couldn't get it confirmed. Now, my question is what difference would a 64-bit processor make? Why does it completely lock up here but seems to work for at least three people on older 32-bit processors? I'm tempted to install 32-bit Debian Wheezy just to see if it makes any difference. I can say that it doesn't seem to matter on a 32-bit live CD here. On 5/15/2013 3:45 PM, Adam Myrow wrote: > Ok, I am using the kernel that ships with Debian 7.0, which is listed > as 3.2.0-4-686-pae. My Dectalk USB works just as it always has in > RS232 mode. In other words, serial support isn't broken for me. This > is the 32-bit version, so maybe that's the difference. > _______________________________________________ Speakup mailing list > Speakup@linux-speakup.org > http://linux-speakup.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/speakup - -- Have a good day, Tony Baechler tony@baechler.net -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/ iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJRlKHnAAoJEPrAuJWnLe0yfn0P/iXnQjg7+/N8wfGHKe1+eSph Urwuctsw+WKw8jwgFEKcHZz8HhkOggfNzttUItcPiTDJfvD/4cg/KIAJ+XKYMCc0 LNxXIZN85uZ2iY5r7xgBgjplbHRsAeLbXrD0UazzXQVkGLfkqC+Kp58aGPGDsY0w //vyg+xvAwggIuFHaSsO9SMBktYKCyGJ4kJn1UOfyZne4TbUQs0rbGG+T1S29p4f /gC0D4uL04Xa374qOSkG+aFso6ET99Ax/3hkPtBZsfL9JZsju3vhhwvoDQtmMONw OPSjNSZoSK0eov9P69HEUuK6QtZwsdE4azk6xDJp0EGftu3cpM0rXm9c0kcLa5k1 MiZsqkM0HNgr8gF72D7f4eIdc/E9zzgK2HC9P0lKaZK5E4q7CR4ASKZKwKKlWcez wvZsCq6MqGmQz5dUD5K2bj2QkZT8E4gzSo8PKso7ELs/fcovca5E910Kgj2B8wnb uaCrsbjlxwFMBONxmc3M4FGXnNv2qzCl56asYOaPT+hAvMM7oOJ/XJHXYq0qm1WP A2/FkoSwM1ks/dDjkngwPP4uF473m2xplApkoEDJA+wcPfzaCS70mDS+PMcVMsZC SNkCPg1zl7MsUm/UED25oJ/ZJ1/HbFKFMGU/Rw5YnCZ0q0UwZtxLDfZZwWPgO1n3 oNMRyb/34AvysFFcJ0GS =BDqC -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----