From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mta1.math.wisc.edu (mta1.math.wisc.edu [144.92.166.23]) by befuddled.reisers.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6DD6E1EF08B for ; Wed, 1 May 2013 15:07:31 -0400 (EDT) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mta1.math.wisc.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 61FD187E00A for ; Wed, 1 May 2013 14:07:29 -0500 (CDT) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at mta1.math.wisc.edu Received: from mta1.math.wisc.edu ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (charlie.math.wisc.edu [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 8vRp9A84I5je for ; Wed, 1 May 2013 14:07:29 -0500 (CDT) Received: from mta1.math.wisc.edu (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mta1.math.wisc.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id E3A3B87E005 for ; Wed, 1 May 2013 14:07:28 -0500 (CDT) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on charlie.math.wisc.edu X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.5 required=6.5 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,BAYES_00 autolearn=disabled version=3.3.1 Received: from mailhost.math.wisc.edu (erdos.math.wisc.edu [144.92.166.25]) by mta1.math.wisc.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP for ; Wed, 1 May 2013 14:07:28 -0500 (CDT) Received: from [144.92.166.19] (vv507j.math.wisc.edu [144.92.166.19]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mailhost.math.wisc.edu (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id E04BC540075 for ; Wed, 1 May 2013 14:07:28 -0500 (CDT) Message-ID: <518167F0.7090807@math.wisc.edu> Date: Wed, 01 May 2013 14:07:28 -0500 From: "John G. Heim" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130307 Thunderbird/17.0.4 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Speakup is a screen review system for Linux." Subject: Re: Any News on cut-and-paste bug? References: <51811C92.4020104@math.wisc.edu> <20130501135012.GA5940@type.youpi.perso.aquilenet.fr> <518137EF.1040502@math.wisc.edu> <20130501154545.GJ5940@type.youpi.perso.aquilenet.fr> <5181419A.2010909@math.wisc.edu> <8582.1367425859@ccs.covici.com> <51815963.2030500@math.wisc.edu> <20130501181345.GT5940@type.youpi.perso.aquilenet.fr> In-Reply-To: <20130501181345.GT5940@type.youpi.perso.aquilenet.fr> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-BeenThere: speakup@linux-speakup.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list Reply-To: "Speakup is a screen review system for Linux." List-Id: "Speakup is a screen review system for Linux." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 01 May 2013 19:07:31 -0000 Are you saying the bug was fixed by modifying speakup to open the serial port the right way? That problem is gone? On 05/01/13 13:13, Samuel Thibault wrote: > John G. Heim, le Wed 01 May 2013 13:05:23 -0500, a écrit : >> But that's no answer. This is the same problem I had with the responses I >> got on the linux-kernel list. I asked extremely specific questions below >> and just saying no isn't enough. > > That's an XYZ problem. People won't answer Y because the actual issue is > X, whose answer is Z. > >> Specifically, what is wrong with my patch? > > It's dealing with Y, not X. > >> Does speakup need to call request_reggion at all? > > It shouldn't have to. > >> If so, why,? What does request_region do? > > Try to circumvent the kernel. > >> It looks as if request_region always fails if you request >> a region at the address of the serial port even if the serial port is not in >> use? Why is that? If this behaviour is by design, what is the speakup code >> supposed to do instead? > > It is supposed to open the serial code a correct way. > > Samuel > _______________________________________________ > Speakup mailing list > Speakup@linux-speakup.org > http://linux-speakup.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/speakup >