From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Greylist: delayed 3600 seconds by postgrey-1.34 at befuddled; Fri, 29 Mar 2013 13:31:26 EDT Received: from vms173021pub.verizon.net (vms173021pub.verizon.net [206.46.173.21]) by befuddled.reisers.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id E03B41EF6EA for ; Fri, 29 Mar 2013 13:31:26 -0400 (EDT) Received: from [192.168.5.102] ([unknown] [96.233.16.186]) by vms173021.mailsrvcs.net (Sun Java(tm) System Messaging Server 7u2-7.02 32bit (built Apr 16 2009)) with ESMTPA id <0MKF00AFCKJSMJ30@vms173021.mailsrvcs.net> for speakup@linux-speakup.org; Fri, 29 Mar 2013 11:31:05 -0500 (CDT) Message-id: <5155C1C8.1040007@verizon.net> Date: Fri, 29 Mar 2013 12:31:04 -0400 From: Al Sten-Clanton User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130311 Thunderbird/17.0.4 MIME-version: 1.0 To: "Speakup is a screen review system for Linux." Subject: Re: Red Hat Enterprise 6.2 References: <963B334B-76C6-494B-B10E-2EEC4631AE1C@gmail.com> <51556090.1040601@baechler.net> <3fb1fb569c54fd8aa7873fa5710d0851@mail.gmail.com> <9E19FD20D2924B07AADB5041AC590F2B@your2c061f0461> <5155AEB1.1060908@baechler.net> <5155AC98.80000@verizon.net> In-reply-to: Content-type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: speakup@linux-speakup.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list Reply-To: "Speakup is a screen review system for Linux." List-Id: "Speakup is a screen review system for Linux." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 29 Mar 2013 17:31:28 -0000 Bill, I guess that rings the old memory bell. If I didn't like yum as much as I do, I might very well revamp my new machine to use Arch or Debian. (you may remember that I chose Fedora last spring because of your speakup-modified version of 17 coming out.) What would I have to know to "get with upstream and make it happen"? Al On 03/29/2013 12:15 PM, William F. Acker WB2FLW +1 303 722 7209 wrote: > What they said, in essence, was that they weren't interested in turning > on Speakup until it was out of staging . I was rather rudely encouraged > to get with upstream and make it happen. > >