From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from dukecmmtar04.coxmail.com (dukecmmtar04.coxmail.com [68.99.120.47]) by befuddled.reisers.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8F0A41EF6C5 for ; Fri, 29 Mar 2013 10:09:44 -0400 (EDT) Received: from dukecmimpo02.coxmail.com ([68.99.120.135]) by dukecmmtar04.coxmail.com (InterMail vM.8.01.05.06 201-2260-151-112-20120208) with ESMTP id <20130329140942.XWQG932.dukecmmtar04.coxmail.com@dukecmimpo02.coxmail.com>; Fri, 29 Mar 2013 10:09:42 -0400 Received: from [192.168.0.101] ([70.166.17.50]) by dukecmimpo02.coxmail.com with bizsmtp id HS9h1l00714oyBJ01S9id5; Fri, 29 Mar 2013 10:09:42 -0400 Message-ID: <5155AEB1.1060908@baechler.net> Date: Fri, 29 Mar 2013 07:09:37 -0800 From: Tony Baechler User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.9.2.28) Gecko/20120306 Thunderbird/3.1.20 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Glenn , "Speakup is a screen review system for Linux." Subject: Re: Red Hat Enterprise 6.2 References: <963B334B-76C6-494B-B10E-2EEC4631AE1C@gmail.com> <51556090.1040601@baechler.net> <3fb1fb569c54fd8aa7873fa5710d0851@mail.gmail.com> <9E19FD20D2924B07AADB5041AC590F2B@your2c061f0461> In-Reply-To: <9E19FD20D2924B07AADB5041AC590F2B@your2c061f0461> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: speakup@linux-speakup.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list Reply-To: "Speakup is a screen review system for Linux." List-Id: "Speakup is a screen review system for Linux." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 29 Mar 2013 14:09:46 -0000 Umm, why? She only works with Fedora as I understand and I'm not even sure if the Speakup Modified Fedora is still current. It would be good if she could get her organization and the AFB involved though. No, I think the only way this will change is if at least a few people complain loudly to the ACB and lflegal.com. Even then, it could take years. I agree that LPI seems better, based on the books I've seen. I personally would be willing to support a movement to make RHEL accessible, but since I don't use it and don't have to, I'm not a good candidate to complain. For those of you living in California, the CCB is also a good choice. They are very strong and have taken on several big companies. Yes, the ACB and CCB require membership, but it isn't expensive and you can call first to see if they're interested in helping. http://ccbnet.org/ On 3/29/2013 5:25 AM, Glenn wrote: > One person I would ask about this is: > Janina Sajka > Her address is: > janina@rednote.net > Glenn