From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-gh0-f173.google.com (mail-gh0-f173.google.com [209.85.160.173]) by befuddled.reisers.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 887BD1EF512 for ; Tue, 11 Dec 2012 11:13:11 -0500 (EST) Received: by mail-gh0-f173.google.com with SMTP id 16so810744ghy.32 for ; Tue, 11 Dec 2012 08:13:09 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=yQ78vOBVC7r9JkJTdObmZP/1UFan4/kCsef+vZpp5Hk=; b=JcawWa/eFOZvt+64HfY+my8mTc+xb6OXZk9KIzeDXAX8W+0DLR3SaVheSJFIH26c5I wL4Ktx0j864ResUqcQIoWVzk1yWLi2eGrZxxZ0XlRi850FnCMbbmYVOn27xRUBAxmR2v SPs+X19i7p3n90vPwWDDqMuEiklYuDht7CVvoKn3PGnXq3eAvGjU8GfXYrpy+QlDw//X tQc8zuUC67MqkxfMv2oF5uSCpqOEgsymM8aMARZVaLQizPwjoLwvAOzBeoTsqefU7ujI Oaj7n0ancqyhsG57NjsMQeOgLqQz+WpdgRgsFWPJhnicS2PJfq87VaBkSg0DrbAvsZdw niuA== Received: by 10.58.15.72 with SMTP id v8mr11634865vec.55.1355242388877; Tue, 11 Dec 2012 08:13:08 -0800 (PST) Received: from pc.kyle.tk ([195.60.76.223]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id zx18sm6879036veb.3.2012.12.11.08.13.06 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Tue, 11 Dec 2012 08:13:08 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <50C75B8D.1090908@gmail.com> Date: Tue, 11 Dec 2012 11:13:01 -0500 From: Kyle User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/17.0 Thunderbird/17.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Speakup is a screen review system for Linux." Subject: Re: experimental js and ajax capable text browser References: <50C73867.70203@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: speakup@linux-speakup.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list Reply-To: "Speakup is a screen review system for Linux." List-Id: "Speakup is a screen review system for Linux." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 11 Dec 2012 16:13:12 -0000 Has any decision been made yet regarding licensing? I understand from the original post that licensing was still undetermined. Personally, I'm a big fan of the unlicense[1] or cc0[2] which can be used for software, unlike most of the CC licenses. On the other hand, if you still wish to retain copyright on the code while preserving software freedom, GPL 2 or later is probably best, unless there's a specific reason i.e. linking against incompatibly licensed code, that GPL can't be used. Generally though, the whole GPL and linking thing usually works the other way, where you can't link against a GPL licensed library with a non-GPL licensed application, so I don't see this as a problem in this case. Just some thoughts, hopefully there's something useful here. [1]: http://unlicense.org/ [2]: http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ ~Kyle http://kyle.tk/ -- "Kyle? ... She calls her cake, Kyle?" Out of This World, season 2 episode 21 - "The Amazing Evie"