From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-gx0-f205.google.com (mail-gx0-f205.google.com [209.85.217.205]) by speech.braille.uwo.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id C264510A34 for ; Sat, 27 Jun 2009 20:27:23 -0400 (EDT) Received: by gxk1 with SMTP id 1so2041203gxk.17 for ; Sat, 27 Jun 2009 17:27:23 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.90.115.17 with SMTP id n17mr4641595agc.88.1246148841803; Sat, 27 Jun 2009 17:27:21 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ?192.168.1.5? (ip72-208-219-132.ph.ph.cox.net [72.208.219.132]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 21sm5582541agd.51.2009.06.27.17.27.20 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Sat, 27 Jun 2009 17:27:21 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4A46B93E.3050708@holmesgrown.com> Date: Sat, 27 Jun 2009 17:28:46 -0700 From: Steve Holmes User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.1pre) Gecko/20090626 Shredder/3.0b3pre MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Speakup is a screen review system for Linux." Subject: Re: speakup: built-in, or module References: <20090610200106.GA22610@rx.localhost> <20090610202547.GA25123@rx.localhost> In-Reply-To: <20090610202547.GA25123@rx.localhost> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: speakup@braille.uwo.ca X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list Reply-To: "Speakup is a screen review system for Linux." List-Id: "Speakup is a screen review system for Linux." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 28 Jun 2009 00:27:24 -0000 Maybe I'm stuck in my old ways or something, but I still like having speech as early as possible so I still use a statically built kernel with my Speakout external synth. But I use software speech a lot too so I might consider switching to modules so I can replace speakup more readily without having to rebuild kernels; even though building a kernel isn't all that hard either. On 06/10/2009 01:25 PM, Chuck Hallenbeck wrote: > Bill, > > Thanks. That sounds like a legitimate reason. > > Chuck > > On Wed, Jun 10, 2009 at 02:19:31PM -0600, William F. Acker WB2FLW +1 303 722 7209 wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> I only build Speakup into the kernel because I don't know how to put >> the modules into Anaconda, the Fedora installer, and have them loaded for >> the, now almost extinct, text installation process. All the parameter >> files are available just as if you had loaded modules. >> >> HTH. >> >> >> -- >> Bill in Denver >> >> On Wed, 10 Jun 2009, Chuck Hallenbeck wrote: >> >> >>> Now that speakup is totally modularized with more recent kernel >>> versions, I am curious whether anyone still modifies one of those >>> kernels to build speakup in, and if so what the advantages might be. >>> >>> I am also curious about where the speakup parameters might be found in >>> the event that speakup is built into a recent kernel. Would there still >>> be a /sys/module/speakup/parameters directory, if speakup were not a >>> module? >>> >>> Chuck >>> >>> -- >>> The Moon is Waning Gibbous (92% of Full) >>> My web site: www.hallenbeck.ftml.net >>> Microblog: http://identi.ca >>> -------- >>> The reason that every major university maintains a department of >>> mathematics is that it's cheaper than institutionalizing all those people. >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Speakup mailing list >>> Speakup@braille.uwo.ca >>> http://speech.braille.uwo.ca/mailman/listinfo/speakup >>> >>> >> _______________________________________________ >> Speakup mailing list >> Speakup@braille.uwo.ca >> http://speech.braille.uwo.ca/mailman/listinfo/speakup >> >