From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from dukecmmtar04.coxmail.com (dukecmmtar04.coxmail.com [68.99.120.47]) by speech.braille.uwo.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id C8CE110AE7 for ; Thu, 4 Jun 2009 07:08:25 -0400 (EDT) Received: from [192.168.0.29] (really [70.166.17.50]) by dukecmmtar04.coxmail.com (InterMail vM.7.05.02.00 201-2174-114-20060621) with ESMTP id <20090604110046.EBF22356.dukecmmtar04.coxmail.com@[192.168.0.29]> for ; Thu, 4 Jun 2009 07:00:46 -0400 Message-ID: <4A27AB49.4010904@baechler.net> Date: Thu, 04 Jun 2009 04:08:57 -0700 From: Tony Baechler User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.21 (Windows/20090302) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Speakup is a screen review system for Linux." Subject: Re: speakup using different synths with software speech? References: <5D1286E147AA4F92B17EDF969017C6CF@tdsdev> <20090531185400.GB10058@localhost.localdomain> <20090531192320.GA25139@linux1> <20090531195859.GA5899@grml> <036101c9e24a$63683200$6400a8c0@quan> <4A241922.7070204@baechler.net> <1243888309.19200.14.camel@orchid.sented-plants.local> <4A24F34F.8020601@baechler.net> <1243938899.3597.7.camel@orchid.sented-plants.local> In-Reply-To: <1243938899.3597.7.camel@orchid.sented-plants.local> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: speakup@braille.uwo.ca X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list Reply-To: "Speakup is a screen review system for Linux." List-Id: "Speakup is a screen review system for Linux." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 04 Jun 2009 11:08:26 -0000 Who said anything about paying for Windows? I got it installed from the dealer who built the machine, or with my Dell machines, directly from Dell when I got it. I've never had to pay for Windows in my life and I'm not sure why I would. I understand the licensing is different for Vista and Windows 7, but with Windows 98 and XP, I just have my dealer install it for me. That also saves me the trouble of getting sighted help. I'm not opposed to spending money on speech, but I've already sunk a fortune into hardware synths which have a lot better quality, so the idea of buying software speech is foreign to me. Also, I've had my income cut twice this year already, so I really can't afford any other expenses right now if I had to because the money just isn't there. I know of at least one other person on this list who uses Linux because money is an issue, and two others who still use DOS, partially for the same reason. Georgina Joyce wrote: > Well if paying for windows works for you then that's alright. I don't > have the time to write out instructions on how to use cepstral voices > when you just want to complain about espeak and have no intention on > using them because they cost money. > > It's your perspectives that are stopping you from using linux. >