From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from dukecmmtar01.coxmail.com (dukecmmtar01.coxmail.com [68.99.120.48]) by speech.braille.uwo.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5B8BA10A12 for ; Mon, 1 Dec 2008 05:48:47 -0500 (EST) Received: from [192.168.0.30] (really [70.166.17.50]) by dukecmmtar01.coxmail.com (InterMail vM.6.01.06.05 201-2131-130-106-20070212) with ESMTP id <20081201105103.SEVH1817.dukecmmtar01.coxmail.com@[192.168.0.30]> for ; Mon, 1 Dec 2008 05:51:03 -0500 Message-ID: <4933C1BA.5020601@baechler.net> Date: Mon, 01 Dec 2008 02:51:38 -0800 From: Tony Baechler User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.18 (Windows/20081105) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Speakup is a screen review system for Linux." Subject: Re: muds References: <7526242620AB4F0B9E2B02BCDFC73DDF@ALONZO> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: speakup@braille.uwo.ca X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: "Speakup is a screen review system for Linux." List-Id: "Speakup is a screen review system for Linux." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 01 Dec 2008 10:48:47 -0000 luke wrote: > Tinyfugue is the only one other than telnet that I have used, but it's > been years. > > TF is the Ubuntu/Debian package. > Hi, I rather like tintin++ better. I think it works better with Speakup and seems a bit easier to use for me. If in doubt, you can do apt-cache search mud or similar. I think the package name is tintin++ but that might be wrong. I like it better than tf as I've said, having used both. I think tf requires a little more setup and is designed for a different type of mud. Also, there is a Windows version of tintin++ called wintin+ or wintin++. Actually, I'm not sure if it's one plus sign or two. The Windows client works exactly like the Linux client including running in console mode.