From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mx4.tartarnet.cz ([81.25.16.212]) by speech.braille.uwo.ca with esmtp (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 1I2hEu-0003Lz-00 for ; Mon, 25 Jun 2007 01:35:52 -0400 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mx4.tartarnet.cz (Postfix) with ESMTP id F370F606F578 for ; Mon, 25 Jun 2007 07:44:59 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at X-Spam-Score: -4.093 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.093 tagged_above=-100 required=5 tests=[ALL_TRUSTED=-1.8, AWL=0.306, BAYES_00=-2.599] Received: from mx4.tartarnet.cz ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mx4.tartarnet.cz [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id GOdoMeyJaP1y for ; Mon, 25 Jun 2007 07:44:58 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [10.0.0.2] (unknown [10.22.13.12]) by mx4.tartarnet.cz (Postfix) with ESMTP id AB656606F562 for ; Mon, 25 Jun 2007 07:44:58 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <467F5430.3020601@brailcom.org> Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2007 07:35:44 +0200 From: Tomas Cerha Organization: Brailcom, o.p.s. User-Agent: IceDove 1.5.0.10 (X11/20070328) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Speakup is a screen review system for Linux." Subject: Re: Assistance with a dual-core machine. References: <000a01c7b647$edc2d350$6401a8c0@YOUR3ADE1B78A3> In-Reply-To: <000a01c7b647$edc2d350$6401a8c0@YOUR3ADE1B78A3> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: speakup@braille.uwo.ca X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list Reply-To: "Speakup is a screen review system for Linux." List-Id: "Speakup is a screen review system for Linux." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2007 05:35:53 -0000 Keith Hinton wrote: > At this time, (although) I am sure that CVS SpeechD-up/Dispatcher sounds great, I do not wish > to test it.and would rather run stable releases of the code. Hello Keith, I quite don't understand your reason for refusing running CVS code. That's definitely much simpler and less troublesome than the whole thing with recompiling the kernel etc. The only difference between the released and CVS code is that the released code: A) contains the bug-fixes B) has been tested. A has been done by Hynek, but B can't be done without people testing it. And this is how you can help it to become released. Of course you have the choice to wait until others do so. But if you don't want to wait, I don't see the point in going around rather than going straight. Best regards, Tomas