From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by befuddled.reisers.ca (Postfix, from userid 65534) id B4EFD1F057D; Mon, 5 Jun 2017 01:11:25 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mail-wm0-x22a.google.com (mail-wm0-x22a.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c09::22a]) by befuddled.reisers.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1BA411F0578 for ; Mon, 5 Jun 2017 01:11:24 -0400 (EDT) Received: by mail-wm0-x22a.google.com with SMTP id 123so20579925wmg.1 for ; Sun, 04 Jun 2017 22:11:24 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=QLN/q7KnjGapkxhHpqBfceE2pkSDr71HqXCJyEEKS3k=; b=OFKmF07k3aN0RWNzGG13AF13A8XFWFeBZK/rryaVbMECmD22y3QW83W1n9GnT4s0Pp M+ics3EUjKOzOA4Bo0QSsc+4NWx3mY8e0AFt4jXkRmGkUA6gEcPCzQobrH9ennsbi6D+ xF3aZLsJgUyjaroGl+sRScjkBCM9U411ZKRZd6wy359b9Dh1AB9zVgIJYr4K+qPFLmqF i/5rVljjz5cOim8pWSUCtbUlNkG9S6BkUqh3+MkPruyJOV9R+0TkMuEzibU5L2BOsipl 1e6ycF8PHeEEgod48yLVIKIKSW12AYKRdiBue/t2jN80jbKkUn33WMHwnI0WroHslo1L PBpQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=QLN/q7KnjGapkxhHpqBfceE2pkSDr71HqXCJyEEKS3k=; b=Hvbff++/5r4Dqt7q1wVHIfEZSpn7Jnmp1/0MSmfElmh2mSx8Uo05Xx9qOkc6rVboYD 6bS2LuX4BlRY6+oRqLuVtpC+YYeeIPy4PFLL/N0VC4Jm/qBammdyyhJwAMN9C3efwguK UCv4t6pKq+asotdWJTIoJDLhuqeZ10KlvDHE3HJucVaPrWpgM3wfamXvG8jOYYTTbXez B9B4aPhhqQVkLYzjJlOorDqASwlW1cQoWZwrIZy6scqP/bN65MqLe9cyOltxLfyDtYA4 Rc9/Y1utLQ9W1ijstYJfVcORPrbzwVUId8X/o19cnss5iXBSYMfVmWQzP9iP/4AxO37u YmTQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AODbwcC3e11jhqJ86K6PtA7SzCQABLfIj8lOe5ECIce9vRc0iRMSg2Z4 DE2B31MByjr8Sm/E X-Received: by 10.28.55.69 with SMTP id e66mr6634908wma.16.1496639474935; Sun, 04 Jun 2017 22:11:14 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.0.2] (host81-157-247-88.range81-157.btcentralplus.com. [81.157.247.88]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id b30sm39181821wra.6.2017.06.04.22.11.13 for (version=TLS1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128/128); Sun, 04 Jun 2017 22:11:13 -0700 (PDT) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0) Subject: Re: supporting more than ttyS* From: Okash Khawaja X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (11A501) In-Reply-To: <20170604224730.GA22575@gregn.net> Date: Mon, 5 Jun 2017 06:11:13 +0100 Cc: "speakup@linux-speakup.org" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <45AB8D04-640E-418B-B002-4B232F118A4D@gmail.com> References: <20170602233159.GA13309@gregn.net> <20170602235657.hp5ta2g6jvrsijle@var.youpi.perso.aquilenet.fr> <20170603004451.GA24509@gregn.net> <20170603123241.dvmmhbdq2cwz7nnl@var.youpi.perso.aquilenet.fr> <20170604062241.GD4605@qlf.suddenlink.net> <20170604083717.nrmaztqgzym2rxos@var.youpi.perso.aquilenet.fr> <20170604224730.GA22575@gregn.net> To: "Speakup is a screen review system for Linux." X-Bogosity: Ham, tests=bogofilter, spamicity=0.000000, version=1.2.4 X-BeenThere: speakup@linux-speakup.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Speakup is a screen review system for Linux." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 05 Jun 2017 05:11:25 -0000 > On 4 Jun 2017, at 23:47, Gregory Nowak wrote: >=20 >> On Sun, Jun 04, 2017 at 10:37:17AM +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote: >> Tom Fowle, on sam. 03 juin 2017 23:22:41 -0700, wrote: >>> Since many parallel ports are not bidirectional, it might be hard or >>> impossible to support indexing on a parallel port. >>=20 >> Yes. >=20 > That did occur to me as well. The blazer manual doesn't mention > anywhere that a ieee1284 cable is required. I have in fact used it > under a windows screen reader using a standard non-bidirectional cable > without issues. If a synthesizer supports indexing, would speakup > enable it when using a serial port, and disable it when using a > parallel port, Yes, that should be possible. Haven't looked at code but can't see why we ca= n't disable it on parallel port. On a general note, I don't know much about parallel port programming yet, so= there still might be issues unaddressed in the first pass. Of course we can= come back to them in subsequent patches. Thanks, Okash