From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from gate.ufw2.com([216.163.19.158]) (1928 bytes) by braille.uwo.ca via smail with P:esmtp/D:aliases/T:pipe (sender: ) id for ; Fri, 27 Oct 2000 18:00:48 -0400 (EDT) (Smail-3.2.0.102 1998-Aug-2 #2 built 1999-Sep-5) Received: from [216.163.21.20] by gate.ufw2.com for speakup@braille.uwo.ca id QAA10511; Fri Oct 27 16:59:17 2000 Received: from hardb ([216.163.21.59]) by mail.ufw2.com (Build 101 8.9.3/NT-8.9.3) with SMTP id QAA01076 for ; Fri, 27 Oct 2000 16:59:52 -0500 Message-Id: <3.0.6.32.20001027165956.007e32f0@mail.ufw2.com> X-Sender: bharding@mail.ufw2.com X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Light Version 3.0.6 (32) Date: Fri, 27 Oct 2000 16:59:56 -0500 Subject: Re: which redhat CD's to get In-Reply-To: References: <3.0.6.32.20001027160936.007e47e0@mail.ufw2.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" To: speakup@braille.uwo.ca From: Brent Harding List-Id: Is there a difference between the professional or the regular, or is it all the same stuff on the CD, or obtainable elsewhere? At 04:50 PM 10/27/00 -0500, you wrote: >On Fri, 27 Oct 2000, Brent Harding wrote: > >> I'm thinking of trying redhat, probably 6.2 as 7.0 has that kernel >> headers trouble. What's the difference if I get the cheapbytes CD, or the >> official redhat one, they sell both, redhat one is more expensive... > >This is an excelent question Brent. There are two differences. The first >is that the more expensive version allows you to email RedHat for support >in getting the system setup. (Email only and only for setup is free. And a >30 day limit or some such.) The second difference is that one is much more >expensive then the other one. > >Short take: buy it cheap. > >======= >Kirk Wood >Cpt.Kirk@1tree.net > > > >_______________________________________________ >Speakup mailing list >Speakup@braille.uwo.ca >http://speech.braille.uwo.ca/mailman/listinfo/speakup > > >