From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <bharding@ufw2.com>
Received: from gate.ufw2.com([216.163.19.158]) (1738 bytes) by braille.uwo.ca
	via smail with P:esmtp/D:aliases/T:pipe
	(sender: <bharding@ufw2.com>)
	id <m13oB1k-0013vxC@braille.uwo.ca>
	for <speakup@braille.uwo.ca>; Tue, 24 Oct 2000 16:50:32 -0400 (EDT)
	(Smail-3.2.0.102 1998-Aug-2 #2 built 1999-Sep-5)
Received: from [216.163.21.20] by gate.ufw2.com
	for speakup@braille.uwo.ca
	id PAA28073; Tue Oct 24 15:50:36 2000
Received: from hardb ([216.163.21.59])
	by mail.ufw2.com (Build 101 8.9.3/NT-8.9.3) with SMTP id PAA02589
	for <speakup@braille.uwo.ca>; Tue, 24 Oct 2000 15:50:34 -0500
Message-Id: <3.0.6.32.20001024155107.007d7670@mail.ufw2.com>
X-Sender: bharding@mail.ufw2.com
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Light Version 3.0.6 (32)
Date: Tue, 24 Oct 2000 15:51:07 -0500
Subject: RE: which prebuilt linux boxes seem to work best?
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.21.0010241720520.392-100000@data.home>
References: <3.0.6.32.20001023204832.007d0d70@mail.ufw2.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
To: speakup@braille.uwo.ca
From: Brent Harding <bharding@ufw2.com>
List-Id: <speakup.linux-speakup.org>

Oh, redhat is what I'd be using on such machines where I once thought the
console was the most secure and best way to use it, and that speakup
wouldn't work without reboot without the synth, making the trouble of
unnecessary reboot to use the system.
At 05:22 PM 10/24/00 +1100, you wrote:
>Hi:
>
>Linux with speakup should boot without the synth, but speakup will be
>inoperable for tha session.  In addition to this, it's extremely trivial to
>install a non-speakup kernel under speakup, in fact, redhat seems to do
>this by default according to what I've read.
>
>Geoff.
>
>
>-- 
>Geoff Shang <gshang10@scu.edu.au>
>ICQ number 43634701
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>Speakup mailing list
>Speakup@braille.uwo.ca
>http://speech.braille.uwo.ca/mailman/listinfo/speakup
>
>
>