From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from gate.ufw2.com([216.163.19.158]) (1753 bytes) by braille.uwo.ca via smail with P:esmtp/D:aliases/T:pipe (sender: ) id for ; Fri, 20 Oct 2000 18:20:05 -0400 (EDT) (Smail-3.2.0.102 1998-Aug-2 #2 built 1999-Sep-5) Received: from [216.163.21.20] by gate.ufw2.com for speakup@braille.uwo.ca id RAA18863; Fri Oct 20 17:20:08 2000 Received: from hardb ([216.163.21.59]) by mail.ufw2.com (Build 101 8.9.3/NT-8.9.3) with SMTP id RAA00221 for ; Fri, 20 Oct 2000 17:20:14 -0500 Message-Id: <3.0.6.32.20001020172030.007c1490@mail.ufw2.com> X-Sender: bharding@mail.ufw2.com X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Light Version 3.0.6 (32) Date: Fri, 20 Oct 2000 17:20:30 -0500 Subject: Re: which prebuilt linux boxes seem to work best? In-Reply-To: References: <14830.25191.652842.728964@ncinter.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" To: speakup@braille.uwo.ca From: Brent Harding List-Id: Oh, I was definitely thinking not 7.0 of rh yet, it's too new. Does places like cheapbytes still sell rh 6.2? Once I go through the linux for dumbies, and whatever else I can get from rfb on it, I'd want to work for places that use linux, most to my knowledge use rh, so I'd have to get used to it some time before they ask what types of things I'd know about, or need to know abou. At 01:49 AM 10/19/00 -0500, you wrote: >Brent, > >Lets make this easy for you: >Debian = great >RedHat 6.2 = good >RedHat 7 = very bad and don't come crying if you ignore this >sparc = we don't even want to hear from you > > >======= >Kirk Wood >Cpt.Kirk@1tree.net > > > >_______________________________________________ >Speakup mailing list >Speakup@braille.uwo.ca >http://speech.braille.uwo.ca/mailman/listinfo/speakup > > >