From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from gate.ufw2.com([216.163.19.158]) (2119 bytes) by braille.uwo.ca via smail with P:esmtp/D:aliases/T:pipe (sender: ) id for ; Wed, 18 Oct 2000 22:55:26 -0400 (EDT) (Smail-3.2.0.102 1998-Aug-2 #2 built 1999-Sep-5) Received: from [216.163.21.20] by gate.ufw2.com for speakup@braille.uwo.ca id VAA06459; Wed Oct 18 21:55:03 2000 Received: from hardb ([216.163.21.59]) by mail.ufw2.com (Build 101 8.9.3/NT-8.9.3) with SMTP id VAA01025 for ; Wed, 18 Oct 2000 21:55:12 -0500 Message-Id: <3.0.6.32.20001018215518.007bf850@mail.ufw2.com> X-Sender: bharding@mail.ufw2.com X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Light Version 3.0.6 (32) Date: Wed, 18 Oct 2000 21:55:18 -0500 Subject: Re: CVS speakup with 2.4.0-test9 (was Re: emacs terminal devices) In-Reply-To: References: <14817.25481.20894.433603@jscp.yi.org> <14829.64477.233640.359163@ncinter.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" To: speakup@braille.uwo.ca From: Brent Harding List-Id: Wow, wonder if it's worth upgrading to this, hear it supports usb, wonder about cd-rw usb drives? At 09:00 PM 10/18/00 -0400, you wrote: >Hmmm, that's exactly the same problem that others are reporting. I >haven't tried it yet on test9 but I have it running just fine on >test8. I will try it here at home on my box with test9 sometime in >the next day or so. Does test9 compile and run fine without speakup >patched in? I realize that may not be an easy thing to test, but I >was curious whether you had tried it? > >I guess the next question I should ask everyone here is has anyone >successfully run speakup cvs on the 2.4.0-testxx kernels other than >myself? > > Kirk > >-- > >Kirk Reiser The Computer Braille Facility >e-mail: kirk@braille.uwo.ca University of Western Ontario >phone: (519) 661-3061 > >_______________________________________________ >Speakup mailing list >Speakup@braille.uwo.ca >http://speech.braille.uwo.ca/mailman/listinfo/speakup > > >