From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from gate.ufw2.com([216.163.19.158]) (3532 bytes) by braille.uwo.ca via smail with P:esmtp/D:aliases/T:pipe (sender: ) id for ; Mon, 9 Oct 2000 18:24:11 -0400 (EDT) (Smail-3.2.0.102 1998-Aug-2 #2 built 1999-Sep-5) Received: from [216.163.21.20] by gate.ufw2.com for speakup@braille.uwo.ca id RAA14820; Mon Oct 9 17:20:46 2000 Received: from hardb ([216.163.21.59]) by mail.ufw2.com (Build 101 8.9.3/NT-8.9.3) with SMTP id RAA00308 for ; Mon, 09 Oct 2000 17:21:07 -0500 Message-Id: <3.0.6.32.20001009173011.007a3ea0@mail.ufw2.com> X-Sender: bharding@mail.ufw2.com X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Light Version 3.0.6 (32) Date: Mon, 09 Oct 2000 17:30:11 -0500 Subject: Re: hearing the audio from a remote system In-Reply-To: References: <3.0.6.32.20001008173209.007a3100@mail.ufw2.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" To: speakup@braille.uwo.ca From: Brent Harding List-Id: It's actually a not enough bandwidth at my end issue. Converting bitrates would allow me to listen to stuff I never could before, but now the problem is with msmedia streams entering the picture more than real audio. My isp has plenty of bandwidth, but I don't. At 11:51 AM 10/9/00 -0500, you wrote: >As I mentioned, the bitrate on the ESD server and the play program would >have to match, so it wouldn't convert automatically to a lower bandwith. I >thought you were experiencing packet loss between you and the site, but >perhaps not between other_host and the site, and not between you and >other_host. > >Chris > > >On Sun, 8 Oct 2000, Brent Harding wrote: > >> What, would the server run on the remote machine? Would it convert the >> bitrate to something my modem can handle? >> At 04:59 PM 10/8/00 -0500, you wrote: >> >You might able to use the enlightenment sound daemon (ESD). Have the >> >remote computer run its stream through an ESD server, then use esdplay or >> >something on your local box to connect to the remote esd server and play >> >its audio. Bitrate and such will probably have to match. And this is just >> >an idea. >> > >> >Chris >> > >> > >> >On Sun, 8 Oct 2000, Kirk Wood wrote: >> > >> >> It is quite simple. What you want to do can't be done. When you telnet you >> >> are working on the remote machine. Fully and completely. All commands are >> >> carried out the same as if you were on that machine's console (unless >> >> prohibited or some such thing). >> >> >> >> What you really want is some sort of proxy program to accept the streaming >> >> data and then forward it to you. As far as changing the bit rate it is >> >> most likely a forget it situation. Not on current computers. >> >> >> >> -- >> >> Kirk Wood >> >> Cpt.Kirk@1tree.net >> >> ------------------ >> >> >> >> It's not reality that's important, but how you perceive things. >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> >> Speakup mailing list >> >> Speakup@braille.uwo.ca >> >> http://speech.braille.uwo.ca/mailman/listinfo/speakup >> >> >> > >> > >> >_______________________________________________ >> >Speakup mailing list >> >Speakup@braille.uwo.ca >> >http://speech.braille.uwo.ca/mailman/listinfo/speakup >> > >> > >> > >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Speakup mailing list >> Speakup@braille.uwo.ca >> http://speech.braille.uwo.ca/mailman/listinfo/speakup >> > > >_______________________________________________ >Speakup mailing list >Speakup@braille.uwo.ca >http://speech.braille.uwo.ca/mailman/listinfo/speakup > > >