From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <bharding@ufw2.com>
Received: from gate.ufw2.com([216.163.19.154]) (1567 bytes) by braille.uwo.ca
	via smail with P:esmtp/D:aliases/T:pipe
	(sender: <bharding@ufw2.com>)
	id <m13XyB9-0013voC@braille.uwo.ca>
	for <speakup@braille.uwo.ca>; Sat, 9 Sep 2000 23:53:15 -0400 (EDT)
	(Smail-3.2.0.102 1998-Aug-2 #2 built 1999-Sep-5)
Received: from [216.163.21.20] by gate.ufw2.com
	for speakup@braille.uwo.ca
	id WAA19843; Sat Sep  9 22:48:23 2000
Received: from hardb ([216.163.21.59])
	by mail.ufw2.com (Build 101 8.9.3/NT-8.9.3) with SMTP id WAA00716
	for <speakup@braille.uwo.ca>; Sat, 09 Sep 2000 22:48:33 -0500
Message-Id: <3.0.6.32.20000909225622.0079b730@mail.ufw2.com>
X-Sender: bharding@mail.ufw2.com
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Light Version 3.0.6 (32)
Date: Sat, 09 Sep 2000 22:56:22 -0500
Subject: Re: Voice Synthesizers and now tripple talk
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.05.10009092133001.3605-100000@speech.braille.uw
 o.ca>
References: <x77l8lpvv0.fsf@speech.braille.uwo.ca>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
To: speakup@braille.uwo.ca
From: Brent Harding <bharding@ufw2.com>
List-Id: <speakup.linux-speakup.org>

What's the difference of a tripple talk and a double talk?
My double talk seems just fine, have been using it a few years now, still
works.
At 09:37 PM 9/9/00 -0400, you wrote:
>On 9 Sep 2000, Kirk Reiser wrote:
>
>> "Frank J. Carmickle" <frankiec@braille.uwo.ca> writes:
>> I don't mind writing it, but you have to have one before you can do
>> that.  So far, it's vaporware.
>> 
>Actually they are shipping.  Why they haven't sent you one yet I don't
>know.
>
>FC
>
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>Speakup mailing list
>Speakup@braille.uwo.ca
>http://speech.braille.uwo.ca/mailman/listinfo/speakup
>
>
>