From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by befuddled.reisers.ca (Postfix, from userid 65534) id 184A61EFD7D; Tue, 15 Nov 2016 14:39:01 -0500 (EST) Received: from hera.aquilenet.fr (hera.aquilenet.fr [141.255.128.1]) by befuddled.reisers.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4D7921EFD6B for ; Tue, 15 Nov 2016 14:39:00 -0500 (EST) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by hera.aquilenet.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id CCEBC99CA; Tue, 15 Nov 2016 20:38:59 +0100 (CET) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at aquilenet.fr Received: from hera.aquilenet.fr ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (hera.aquilenet.fr [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id bUl7YH_6Oc82; Tue, 15 Nov 2016 20:38:59 +0100 (CET) Received: from var.youpi.perso.aquilenet.fr (unknown [IPv6:2a01:cb19:181:c200:3602:86ff:fe2c:6a19]) by hera.aquilenet.fr (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 62FB09598; Tue, 15 Nov 2016 20:38:59 +0100 (CET) Received: from samy by var.youpi.perso.aquilenet.fr with local (Exim 4.87) (envelope-from ) id 1c6jZK-0004Ba-Cg; Tue, 15 Nov 2016 20:38:58 +0100 Date: Tue, 15 Nov 2016 20:38:58 +0100 From: Samuel Thibault To: jheim@math.wisc.edu, "Speakup is a screen review system for Linux." Subject: Re: Status of kernel Message-ID: <20161115193858.GS2448@var.home> References: <20161115184710.GI2448@var.home> <0b27a2d0-1514-c31f-1fa5-6215894dc6a7@math.wisc.edu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <0b27a2d0-1514-c31f-1fa5-6215894dc6a7@math.wisc.edu> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21+34 (58baf7c9f32f) (2010-12-30) X-Bogosity: Ham, tests=bogofilter, spamicity=0.000000, version=1.2.4 X-BeenThere: speakup@linux-speakup.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Speakup is a screen review system for Linux." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 15 Nov 2016 19:39:01 -0000 Hello, John G Heim, on Tue 15 Nov 2016 13:31:36 -0600, wrote: > Is that list, linux-serial, the place where most of the discussion on the > status of speakup goes on? No, it was to raise the discussion on how it's supposed to plug. Samuel