From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by befuddled.reisers.ca (Postfix, from userid 65534) id 32B751EF860; Thu, 31 Dec 2015 08:40:41 -0500 (EST) Received: from sonata.ens-lyon.org (domu-toccata.ens-lyon.fr [140.77.166.138]) by befuddled.reisers.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8968E1EF8E9 for ; Thu, 31 Dec 2015 08:39:58 -0500 (EST) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sonata.ens-lyon.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7BBFD200BF for ; Thu, 31 Dec 2015 14:39:57 +0100 (CET) Received: from sonata.ens-lyon.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (sonata.ens-lyon.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id l6KJ6jhk46Ie for ; Thu, 31 Dec 2015 14:39:57 +0100 (CET) Received: from var.youpi.perso.aquilenet.fr (ABordeaux-655-1-80-117.w90-60.abo.wanadoo.fr [90.60.111.117]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by sonata.ens-lyon.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 5D9C8200BD for ; Thu, 31 Dec 2015 14:39:57 +0100 (CET) Received: from samy by var.youpi.perso.aquilenet.fr with local (Exim 4.86) (envelope-from ) id 1aEdSO-0001oP-VO for speakup@linux-speakup.org; Thu, 31 Dec 2015 14:39:56 +0100 Date: Thu, 31 Dec 2015 14:39:56 +0100 From: Samuel Thibault To: "Speakup is a screen review system for Linux." Subject: Re: Getting speakup to run on debian Message-ID: <20151231133956.GD4579@var.home> References: <558A5D8D.20209@gmail.com> <20151231130156.GV4579@var.home> <5617.1451568703@ccs.covici.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <5617.1451568703@ccs.covici.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21+34 (58baf7c9f32f) (2010-12-30) X-Bogosity: Ham, tests=bogofilter, spamicity=0.000000, version=1.2.4 X-BeenThere: speakup@linux-speakup.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: "Speakup is a screen review system for Linux." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 31 Dec 2015 13:40:42 -0000 covici@ccs.covici.com, on Thu 31 Dec 2015 08:31:43 -0500, wrote: > That would be nice. I wonder if you can do this from kernel space, > though? It's the kernel which does have the backlog. So for sure it should be feasible to do it from the kernel space. Samuel