From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by befuddled.reisers.ca (Postfix, from userid 65534) id CC1E51EF82E; Wed, 8 Oct 2014 19:17:56 -0400 (EDT) Received: from lothlorien.nfbcal.org (ns.NFBCAL.ORG [157.22.230.125]) by befuddled.reisers.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0F18A1EF833 for ; Wed, 8 Oct 2014 19:17:40 -0400 (EDT) Received: from lothlorien.nfbcal.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by lothlorien.nfbcal.org (8.14.1/8.14.1-NFBNETBSD) with ESMTP id s98NHQaI005423 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Wed, 8 Oct 2014 16:17:26 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.97.3 at lothlorien.nfbcal.org Received: (from buhrow@localhost) by lothlorien.nfbcal.org (8.14.1/8.12.11) id s98NHQmn012934; Wed, 8 Oct 2014 16:17:26 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <201410082317.s98NHQmn012934@lothlorien.nfbcal.org> From: Brian Buhrow Date: Wed, 8 Oct 2014 16:17:26 -0700 In-Reply-To: <86fvey1i06.fsf@vibrator.pk5001z> X-Mailer: Mail User's Shell (7.2.6 beta(4.pl1)+dynamic 20000103) To: "Speakup is a screen review system for Linux." Subject: Re: the push to get rid of CONFIG_VT in the kernel and the future of Speakup X-Greylist: Sender passed SPF test, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.2.6 (lothlorien.nfbcal.org [127.0.0.1]); Wed, 08 Oct 2014 16:17:27 -0700 (PDT) X-Bogosity: Ham, tests=bogofilter, spamicity=0.000000, version=1.2.4 Cc: buhrow@nfbcal.org X-BeenThere: speakup@linux-speakup.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: "Speakup is a screen review system for Linux." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 08 Oct 2014 23:17:58 -0000 hello. My two cents is that it's worth developing Yasr further. Yasr runs on any version of Unix, in fact I use it every day on NetBSD systems and am typing this message from a Yasr equipped NetBSD system. I find Yasr to be stable, responsive and quite functional. In fact, for me, it just gets out of the way and lets me get my job done. -thanks -Brian On Oct 8, 12:25pm, Deedra Waters wrote: } Subject: Re: the push to get rid of CONFIG_VT in the kernel and the future } SSBsb3ZlIHNwZWFrdXAgYnV0IGkgdGhpbmsgaGVyZSBpcyB3aGVyZSBtYXliZSB3ZSBhIGxvb2sg } YXQgaGVscGluZyB3aXRoCnlhc3IgdG8gbWFrZSBpdCBhIGJldHRlciBzY3JlZW5yZWFkZXIsIGIs } IGhlbHAgd2l0aCBicmx0dHkgYW5kIGltcHJvdmUKaXQncyBzY3JlZW4gcmVhZGVyIGZ1bmN0aW9u } cywgb3IgYywganVzdCByZWludmVudCB0aGUgd2hlZWwuIFBlcnNvbmFsbHkKaXQgbWlnaHQgYmUg } d29ydGggaW1wcm92aW5nIG9uIHRoZSBleGlzdGluZyBzY3JlZW4gcmVhZGVycyBsaWtlIGJybHR0 } eQpvciB5YXNyIAotLSAKV2Vic2l0ZTogaHR0cDovL2RlZWRyYS50aGUtYnJhbm5vbnMuY29tCmJs } b2c6IGh0dHA6Ly9kZWVkcmEudGhlLWJyYW5ub25zLmNvbS9ibG9nCgpfX19fX19fX19fX19fX19f } X19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fXwpTcGVha3VwIG1haWxpbmcgbGlzdApTcGVh } a3VwQGxpbnV4LXNwZWFrdXAub3JnCmh0dHA6Ly9saW51eC1zcGVha3VwLm9yZy9jZ2ktYmluL21h } aWxtYW4vbGlzdGluZm8vc3BlYWt1cAo= >-- End of excerpt from Deedra Waters