From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by befuddled.reisers.ca (Postfix, from userid 65534) id 927EF1EF6B1; Sat, 29 Jun 2013 00:00:40 -0400 (EDT) Received: from jdc.jasonjgw.net (jdc.jasonjgw.net [59.167.198.218]) by befuddled.reisers.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CCA881EF56E for ; Sat, 29 Jun 2013 00:00:39 -0400 (EDT) Received: by jdc.jasonjgw.net (Postfix, from userid 1000) id D4BDB18063584; Sat, 29 Jun 2013 14:00:29 +1000 (EST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=jasonjgw.net; s=mail; t=1372478429; bh=A7jPP4r9IgqCYu/TwlnBE0n7pCJI6XMtYzBxcRcKql8=; h=Date:From:To:Subject:References:In-Reply-To; b=S19Cd/oSqYUY/3wWSWiiADF2lzMTE3ifaFL64o1HB33qqyNFUwi32QEziCxR+8xA3 aEo7O4A6bf8kPWISQIWmTstOJo/P/UGOnXnAgsJwurx/2GzrugoSDr+SlyvRU/Mmda wDimoBCqm1k8RY6YasNd4RntxfysGEThHkfKIQAY= Date: Sat, 29 Jun 2013 14:00:29 +1000 From: Jason White To: speakup@linux-speakup.org Subject: Re: reccommended email client with speakup Message-ID: <20130629040029.GA8481@jdc.jasonjgw.net> References: <910d1db7-d93b-4761-bff5-22ee11f0ca45@default> <51CE0D4D.3040502@raspberryvi.org> <871u7lmx0r.fsf@mushroom.PK5001Z> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <871u7lmx0r.fsf@mushroom.PK5001Z> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-Bogosity: Ham, tests=bogofilter, spamicity=0.000000, version=1.2.2 X-BeenThere: speakup@linux-speakup.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list Reply-To: "Speakup is a screen review system for Linux." List-Id: "Speakup is a screen review system for Linux." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 29 Jun 2013 04:00:40 -0000 Chris Brannon wrote: > I'm also a gnus fan. It has a bit of a learning curve, but it is quite > capable. > Agreed. It supports NNTP newsgroups as well, including gmane.org. > I used to really love nmh, which is a suite of tools for mail handling. > Instead of working inside a monolithic email program, the nmh user > manipulates their email using various small shell commands. > It's a totally different paradigm. > Unfortunately, it doesn't play all that well with typical modern mail > configurations. For instance, I keep my mail on a VPS, > and I read it with IMAP, rather than pulling it down to my local machine. > If you're willing to read mail from the shell on your mail server, or > you're willing to pull it down to the local machine using getmail or > fetchmail, then nmh works beautifully. I'm in that category; I should perhaps install nmh at some point. The new tool which is starting to attract attention in the Linux community is NotMuch (http://www.notmuchmail.org/).