From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from toccata.ens-lyon.org (toccata.ens-lyon.org [140.77.166.68]) by speech.braille.uwo.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id BC5D3C1A40E; Sat, 11 Dec 2010 21:40:37 -0500 (EST) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by toccata.ens-lyon.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1BC3C840C8; Sun, 12 Dec 2010 03:40:37 +0100 (CET) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at toccata.ens-lyon.org Received: from toccata.ens-lyon.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (toccata.ens-lyon.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Is-Nq-2yRtdj; Sun, 12 Dec 2010 03:40:36 +0100 (CET) Received: from const.ipv6 (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by toccata.ens-lyon.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 9060A840BB; Sun, 12 Dec 2010 03:40:36 +0100 (CET) Received: from samy by const.ipv6 with local (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1PRbme-0002sF-Eg; Sun, 12 Dec 2010 03:35:32 +0100 Date: Sun, 12 Dec 2010 10:35:32 +0800 From: Samuel Thibault To: Christopher Brannon , Greg KH , kirk@braille.uwo.ca, speakup@braille.uwo.ca Subject: Re: World writable speakup files in Linux next Message-ID: <20101212023532.GA6486@const> References: <20101210190047.GA19219@kroah.com> <87lj3wufx7.fsf@the-brannons.com> <20101211222834.GA27436@linux1> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <20101211222834.GA27436@linux1> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.12-2006-07-14 X-BeenThere: speakup@braille.uwo.ca X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list Reply-To: "Speakup is a screen review system for Linux." List-Id: "Speakup is a screen review system for Linux." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 12 Dec 2010 02:40:37 -0000 William Hubbs, le Sat 11 Dec 2010 16:28:34 -0600, a écrit : > I don't think we should remove the world > writable bit until we know for sure whether udev can do anything with > the /sys hierarchy. Even better: the writable bit shouldn't be dropped until udev actually does something, so that upgrading the udev version will be enough to keep things working seamlessly. Samuel