From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-pw0-f42.google.com (mail-pw0-f42.google.com [209.85.160.42]) by speech.braille.uwo.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2F6B2C1A401 for ; Fri, 8 Oct 2010 11:06:33 -0400 (EDT) Received: by pwi10 with SMTP id 10so318154pwi.29 for ; Fri, 08 Oct 2010 08:06:32 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.142.217.9 with SMTP id p9mr2084238wfg.296.1286550391253; Fri, 08 Oct 2010 08:06:31 -0700 (PDT) Received: from lnx3.holmesgrown.com (ip72-208-185-148.ph.ph.cox.net [72.208.185.148]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id x8sm3811599wff.23.2010.10.08.08.06.29 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Fri, 08 Oct 2010 08:06:30 -0700 (PDT) Date: Fri, 8 Oct 2010 08:06:26 -0700 From: Steve Holmes To: speakup@braille.uwo.ca Subject: Re: preparing speakup for staging Message-ID: <20101008150626.GA24147@lnx3.holmesgrown.com> Mail-Followup-To: speakup@braille.uwo.ca References: <20101008001547.GB18994@linux1> <20101008072515.GA5354@const.bordeaux.inria.fr> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <20101008072515.GA5354@const.bordeaux.inria.fr> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-BeenThere: speakup@braille.uwo.ca X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list Reply-To: "Speakup is a screen review system for Linux." List-Id: "Speakup is a screen review system for Linux." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 08 Oct 2010 15:06:33 -0000 That's exciting we're that much closer to full Kernel inclusion. I do have one question though; is the serial support for recent kernels still broken? I know the last time I tried my speakout synth, it still wouldn't work. I have tested it with other serial communications and used it on another machine where I have a very old kernel so the synth, port and cable are good. It just seems ironic that even though software synthesis has become increasingly popular and convenient, the one thing that speakup used to require and stood out with was serial support which now doesn't work in many cases. If I understood that code base better, I could try and debug it/fix it. On Fri, Oct 08, 2010 at 09:25:15AM +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote: > William Hubbs, le Thu 07 Oct 2010 19:15:47 -0500, a écrit : > > But, I don't think that is a good > > idea, because it means that we would have to maintain two > > branches in the repository from now on and make sure that all changes to > > master went to the other branch as well. > > That's precisely what git is really good at: having branches and merge > on a regular basis. > > That being said, we still probably need to establish a workflow to > maintain a modular speakup and the staging speakup. > > Samuel > _______________________________________________ > Speakup mailing list > Speakup@braille.uwo.ca > http://speech.braille.uwo.ca/mailman/listinfo/speakup