From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from cdptpa-omtalb.mail.rr.com (cdptpa-omtalb.mail.rr.com [75.180.132.120]) by speech.braille.uwo.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9680C10A55 for ; Tue, 8 Sep 2009 12:46:31 -0400 (EDT) Received: from linux1.localdomain ([76.183.49.63]) by cdptpa-omta01.mail.rr.com with ESMTP id <20090908164631238.CLGD5638@cdptpa-omta01.mail.rr.com> for ; Tue, 8 Sep 2009 16:46:31 +0000 Received: by linux1.localdomain (Postfix, from userid 1000) id BD52043C03; Tue, 8 Sep 2009 11:46:30 -0500 (CDT) Date: Tue, 8 Sep 2009 11:46:30 -0500 From: William Hubbs To: "Speakup is a screen review system for Linux." Subject: Re: how to tell which synthesizer is active Message-ID: <20090908164630.GA25282@linux1> Mail-Followup-To: "Speakup is a screen review system for Linux." References: <14688.1252299370@ccs.covici.com> <4AA5C28E.6090506@baechler.net> <14244.1252384580@ccs.covici.com> <20090908151235.GA24861@linux1> <957.1252426474@ccs.covici.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <957.1252426474@ccs.covici.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) X-BeenThere: speakup@braille.uwo.ca X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list Reply-To: "Speakup is a screen review system for Linux." List-Id: "Speakup is a screen review system for Linux." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 08 Sep 2009 16:46:31 -0000 On Tue, Sep 08, 2009 at 12:14:34PM -0400, covici@ccs.covici.com wrote: > Well, what used to happen is that speakup actually probed and if the > synth was not there, then the synth was set to none, but now I guess it > does not do that anymore, but I agree that releasing the synth because > of timeouts may not be a good idea, but could there be a way to see if > the synth is there? We stopped probing because it was causing issues with some synthesizers and other hardware as I remember, so I don't see us re-implementing probing. I might be able to set it to none if we time out, but the current design would mean that it would also be set to none if you hit print screen to turn off speakup, so I don't know if you want that either. What do you think? William