From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from cdptpa-omtalb.mail.rr.com (cdptpa-omtalb.mail.rr.com [75.180.132.121]) by speech.braille.uwo.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4134B10B77 for ; Thu, 4 Jun 2009 17:02:29 -0400 (EDT) Received: from linux1.localdomain ([66.25.35.110]) by cdptpa-omta04.mail.rr.com with ESMTP id <20090604210228758.DVSY28090@cdptpa-omta04.mail.rr.com> for ; Thu, 4 Jun 2009 21:02:28 +0000 Received: by linux1.localdomain (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 4F25F464FE; Thu, 4 Jun 2009 16:02:28 -0500 (CDT) Date: Thu, 4 Jun 2009 16:02:28 -0500 From: William Hubbs To: "Speakup is a screen review system for Linux." Subject: Re: speakup 3.0.4 and the timeout issue Message-ID: <20090604210228.GA18913@linux1> Mail-Followup-To: "Speakup is a screen review system for Linux." References: <4A25BC31.2050500@aim.com> <4A280221.8010600@baechler.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; x-action=pgp-signed Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4A280221.8010600@baechler.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.16 (2007-06-09) X-BeenThere: speakup@braille.uwo.ca X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list Reply-To: "Speakup is a screen review system for Linux." List-Id: "Speakup is a screen review system for Linux." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 04 Jun 2009 21:02:29 -0000 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hi Tony, On Thu, Jun 04, 2009 at 10:19:29AM -0700, Tony Baechler wrote: > For what it's worth, I'm still having the same issue. It is definitely > better than it was and the keypad plus reads the screen without a long > delay, but it still times out when a lot of text is sent. My full_time > value is 60000 and I'm using a Trippletalk. It can handle more text than > it used to, but it still isn't a huge amount. Interestingly, the full_time > value on the other machine running an older version of Speakup without the > timeout issues is 5000, so I think there's more to the problem than the > full_time setting. Also, setting direct to 1 does seem to help very > slightly, even though it's a hardware synth. Actually this brings up another issue that we have and we know about. Direct is not yet supported for hardware synths, but there is a sys file for it. There are several other options like this which are synthesizer specific but always have a sys file. The way to see that it is not supported is to cat the sys file after you change the valu; it will not reflect your change if it isn't supported. We have chatted some about this on irc, and it is looking like it will take a redesign of the sys files to fix this. William -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.11 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAkooNmQACgkQblQW9DDEZTiihACgkt74khtckNQeSlN8b2od2qn4 TV4AnjWE4KPZlzTDr0HWRYNNws1mShel =B88H -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----