From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from fed1rmmtao101.cox.net (fed1rmmtao101.cox.net [68.230.241.45]) by speech.braille.uwo.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5052110A23 for ; Mon, 20 Oct 2008 07:13:46 -0400 (EDT) Received: from fed1rmimpo02.cox.net ([70.169.32.72]) by fed1rmmtao101.cox.net (InterMail vM.7.08.02.01 201-2186-121-102-20070209) with ESMTP id <20081020111448.MRWD6175.fed1rmmtao101.cox.net@fed1rmimpo02.cox.net> for ; Mon, 20 Oct 2008 07:14:48 -0400 Received: from lnx2.holmesgrown.com ([72.208.219.132]) by fed1rmimpo02.cox.net with bizsmtp id UzEn1a0012rzSAG04zEnFZ; Mon, 20 Oct 2008 07:14:47 -0400 X-Authority-Analysis: v=1.0 c=1 a=xIXUgMBjPlrSbzK_z0EA:9 a=ah3PCKH2uyBt7wjBA7I2gE0lupQA:4 a=rPt6xJ-oxjAA:10 X-CM-Score: 0.00 Received: from lnx3.holmesgrown.com ([192.168.1.5] ident=Debian-exim) by lnx2.holmesgrown.com with esmtp (Exim 4.62) (envelope-from ) id 1Krsik-0004Bs-TZ for speakup@braille.uwo.ca; Mon, 20 Oct 2008 04:14:46 -0700 Received: from steve by lnx3.holmesgrown.com with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Krsil-0006ag-7t for speakup@braille.uwo.ca; Mon, 20 Oct 2008 04:14:47 -0700 Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2008 04:14:47 -0700 From: Steve Holmes To: speakup@braille.uwo.ca Subject: Kernels in Debian Message-ID: <20081020111446.GA23027@lnx3.holmesgrown.com> Mail-Followup-To: speakup@braille.uwo.ca MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; x-action=pgp-signed Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) X-BeenThere: speakup@braille.uwo.ca X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: "Speakup is a screen review system for Linux." List-Id: "Speakup is a screen review system for Linux." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2008 11:13:46 -0000 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: RIPEMD160 Hey, just curious. When updating to latest git-pull of speakup, do most Deb users go with Debian's kernel source or do they use the generic one from ftp.kernel.org? I'm about to update my copy of speakup and even with 2.6.26, the install script in speakup appears to need a kernel source tree. Is my observation correct here? -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) iEYEAREDAAYFAkj8aCYACgkQWSjv55S0LfG1ugCg+mOnm+sbu8luuI2ZTI7nzavC eyUAnimQ4/ykAqdSIcAr4ozMqlzdtvS2 =vYcp -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----