From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from SMTP.EU.CITRIX.COM (smtp.ctxuk.citrix.com [62.200.22.115]) by speech.braille.uwo.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5B16D10B70 for ; Tue, 17 Jun 2008 05:15:33 -0400 (EDT) X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.27,657,1204520400"; d="scan'208";a="628062" Received: from lonpexchmx01.citrite.net ([10.30.224.191]) by LONPIPO01.EU.CITRIX.COM with ESMTP; 17 Jun 2008 05:15:31 -0400 Received: from implementation.famille.thibault.fr ([10.80.12.250]) by lonpexchmx01.citrite.net with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Tue, 17 Jun 2008 10:15:31 +0100 Received: from samy by implementation.famille.thibault.fr with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1K8XHr-0001hB-K2 for speakup@braille.uwo.ca; Tue, 17 Jun 2008 11:15:35 +0200 Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2008 10:15:35 +0100 From: Samuel Thibault To: "Speakup is a screen review system for Linux." Subject: Re: Scroll lock bug Message-ID: <20080617091535.GE5994@implementation.uk.xensource.com> References: <20080615131850.GP4770@implementation> <20080615162027.GM4770@implementation> <20080616093940.GE4381@implementation.uk.xensource.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.12-2006-07-14 X-OriginalArrivalTime: 17 Jun 2008 09:15:31.0575 (UTC) FILETIME=[B1077870:01C8D05A] X-BeenThere: speakup@braille.uwo.ca X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.10 Precedence: list Reply-To: "Speakup is a screen review system for Linux." List-Id: "Speakup is a screen review system for Linux." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2008 09:15:33 -0000 luke, le Tue 17 Jun 2008 04:40:42 -0400, a écrit : > On Mon, 16 Jun 2008, Samuel Thibault wrote: > > luke, le Mon 16 Jun 2008 04:17:15 -0400, a écrit : > > > It solves that problem, which creates another, far worse. > > > Particularly, all review key functions behave with intolerable slowness. > > > > Could you try > > git checkout 28b0bfd7 > > to make sure that you are getting the fix for scroll lock, and not a > > more recent change that involved flush? > > Having updated per your instructions, I find that the fix for scroll lock > is working properly, and the delays in review functions are gone. Ok, thanks for testing, it's good to know. > As for the flush change: is that ready for testing, or is it still in the > state it was when I accidentally tried it before? Nothing happened yet because we weren't able to reproduce the issue. We'll try to understand what happens now that we know it's the flush move. Samuel