From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from fed1rmmtao104.cox.net (fed1rmmtao104.cox.net [68.230.241.42]) by speech.braille.uwo.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8105910A43 for ; Fri, 30 May 2008 10:40:59 -0400 (EDT) Received: from fed1rmimpo03.cox.net ([70.169.32.75]) by fed1rmmtao104.cox.net (InterMail vM.7.08.02.01 201-2186-121-102-20070209) with ESMTP id <20080530144058.HMDQ11242.fed1rmmtao104.cox.net@fed1rmimpo03.cox.net> for ; Fri, 30 May 2008 10:40:58 -0400 Received: from lnx2.holmesgrown.com ([72.208.219.132]) by fed1rmimpo03.cox.net with bizsmtp id Xqgy1Z00Q2rzSAG04qgzB4; Fri, 30 May 2008 10:40:59 -0400 Received: from lnx3.holmesgrown.com ([192.168.1.5] ident=8) by lnx2.holmesgrown.com with esmtp (Exim 4.62) (envelope-from ) id 1K25mv-0002RF-Ga for speakup@braille.uwo.ca; Fri, 30 May 2008 07:41:01 -0700 Received: from steve by lnx3.holmesgrown.com with local (Exim 4.62) (envelope-from ) id 1K25nB-0000z3-W4 for speakup@braille.uwo.ca; Fri, 30 May 2008 07:41:18 -0700 Date: Fri, 30 May 2008 07:41:17 -0700 From: Steve Holmes To: speakup@braille.uwo.ca Subject: Re: Feedback on 3.0.3 Message-ID: <20080530144117.GE3288@lnx3.holmesgrown.com> Mail-Followup-To: speakup@braille.uwo.ca References: <20080529234527.GA3686@babel.localdomain> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; x-action=pgp-signed Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20080529234527.GA3686@babel.localdomain> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01) X-BeenThere: speakup@braille.uwo.ca X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.10 Precedence: list Reply-To: "Speakup is a screen review system for Linux." List-Id: "Speakup is a screen review system for Linux." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 30 May 2008 14:40:59 -0000 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: RIPEMD160 Is there still any restrictions concerning statically including more than one synth module in speakup or is that no longer an issue? Like can you statically include spkout and sftsyn in the same kernel? Thanks also for the progress made and the ability to keep up with new kernels again. On Thu, May 29, 2008 at 04:45:27PM -0700, Zachary Kline wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > Hi, > I'm glad to report that thus far I've been using 3.0.3 on Debian with a > 2.6.25.4 kernel and software speech through Ttsynth. The performance is > just as good as the previous 3.0.2 version was. If it makes any > difference, the software speech along with the rest of Speakup is built > into the kernel. > Congratulations on what seems a job well-done. > Thanks, > Zack. > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) > > iD8DBQFIP0AXGSGPv8lrY20RAh/TAKCcs3pSlcQ+b8XBauvZG4rJQYRxeQCgjsxP > RADLbLkdh+t6TLj1akPKFMo= > =LuDM > -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- > _______________________________________________ > Speakup mailing list > Speakup@braille.uwo.ca > http://speech.braille.uwo.ca/mailman/listinfo/speakup - -- HolmesGrown Solutions The best solutions for the best price! http://holmesgrown.ld.net/ -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFIQBINWSjv55S0LfERA+7hAKDbnXZ15IlWSFSR/5RuskxoaGC9aQCfT5iF 8gnEHisfbB8e+JFi7SZm5Ts= =6tz5 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----