From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from opera.rednote.net (opera.rednote.net [75.125.70.226]) by speech.braille.uwo.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 00388109C1 for ; Wed, 21 May 2008 23:40:36 -0400 (EDT) Received: from opera.rednote.net ([IPv6:::1]) by opera.rednote.net (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id m4KLSr1K028263 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Tue, 20 May 2008 21:28:53 GMT Received: (from janina@localhost) by opera.rednote.net (8.14.2/8.14.2/Submit) id m4KLSr6O028262 for speakup@braille.uwo.ca; Tue, 20 May 2008 17:28:53 -0400 Date: Tue, 20 May 2008 17:28:53 -0400 From: Janina Sajka To: "Speakup is a screen review system for Linux." Subject: Re: Problem with Fedora9 and Speakup Message-ID: <20080520212853.GU5694@rednote.net> References: <20080516182107.GA21702@localhost.localdomain> <006d01c8b9b6$ad24b6b0$4ba65c90@vv507j> <20080519162247.GA9784@clearwire.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20080519162247.GA9784@clearwire.net> X-Operating-System: Linux opera.rednote.net 2.6.25.3-18.spk.fc9.x86_64 Organization: Capital Accessibility LLC (http://www.CapitalAccessibility.com) X-PGP-Key: http://www.CapitalAccessibility.com/JaninaSajka_gpg_key.html User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01) X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV version 0.93, clamav-milter version 0.93 on opera.rednote.net X-Virus-Status: Clean X-BeenThere: speakup@braille.uwo.ca X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.10 Precedence: list Reply-To: "Speakup is a screen review system for Linux." List-Id: "Speakup is a screen review system for Linux." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 22 May 2008 03:40:37 -0000 > On Mon, May 19, 2008 at 08:46:01AM -0500, John Heim wrote: > > How exactly does one go about updating the documentation? Well, in the case of the Speakup Modified Installation HOWTO, we're pretty open. 1.) Patch files to the existing html document would be grand. Of course we do reserve all editorial rights. 2.) If that's daunting, a simple email with suggested revised text is also welcome. 3.) Last, but certainly not least, pointers to our errors with suggested corrections are also appreciated. Please note that it will take much longer to incorporate anything we get via #3 than good copy received via #1. Basically, the less you ask me to do, the quicker it can get done. Lastly, let me note that I keep a email folder of suggestions people make and review those suggestions whenever I create a new HOWTO revision. As noted in the HOWTO, it is indeed the product of many such suggestions. Now, if none of this is what you want to do--hey, anybody can go publish their own docs, right? Everyone is clear about that, right? Janina