From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.ctxuk.citrix.com ([62.200.22.115] helo=SMTP.EU.CITRIX.COM) by speech.braille.uwo.ca with esmtp (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 1JtNSd-0002Wb-00 for ; Tue, 06 May 2008 09:44:03 -0400 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.27,443,1204520400"; d="scan'208";a="36724" Received: from lonpexchmx01.citrite.net ([10.30.224.191]) by LONPIPO01.EU.CITRIX.COM with ESMTP; 06 May 2008 09:43:32 -0400 Received: from implementation.famille.thibault.fr ([10.80.12.250]) by lonpexchmx01.citrite.net with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Tue, 6 May 2008 14:43:32 +0100 Received: from samy by implementation.famille.thibault.fr with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1JtNS7-0003RN-Rj for speakup@braille.uwo.ca; Tue, 06 May 2008 15:43:31 +0200 Date: Tue, 6 May 2008 14:43:31 +0100 From: Samuel Thibault To: "Speakup is a screen review system for Linux." Subject: Re: Speakup on Ubuntu 8.04 Hardy Message-ID: <20080506134331.GK4430@implementation.uk.xensource.com> References: <000001c8af7e$62d95710$553f4381@alastairirving> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <000001c8af7e$62d95710$553f4381@alastairirving> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.12-2006-07-14 X-OriginalArrivalTime: 06 May 2008 13:43:32.0968 (UTC) FILETIME=[2CEFCE80:01C8AF7F] X-BeenThere: speakup@braille.uwo.ca X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list Reply-To: "Speakup is a screen review system for Linux." List-Id: "Speakup is a screen review system for Linux." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 06 May 2008 13:44:03 -0000 Alastair Irving, le Tue 06 May 2008 14:37:53 +0100, a écrit : > I was wondering if there's any plans to create a speakup package for ubuntu > 8.04? There are plans to do so in Debian, I guess Ubuntu will just follow shortly after. > In Ubuntu Feisty, it seemed that the kernel-patch-speakup package could be > installed directly without installing a new kernel. Could someone possibly > explain how this worked? Because that's only the patch, not the compiled form. And it is very old. Samuel